floridays
Well-Known Member
Succinct once again.They catch you in the men’s room soliciting again?
And very funny .
Succinct once again.They catch you in the men’s room soliciting again?
DoubtfulShe was laughing at herself.
I like the way you think, if I was half as eloquent and direct I would have made a lot more money in my career.You mean, context can influence the meaning of words?
And that, if you don’t consider context, your interpretation is flawed?
And that, if you’re vigorously defending a flawed interpretation, you are presenting yourself as the fool?
The thought police ?
The thought police ?
However, with Facebook censoring this photo you could also make the claim - "this is what happens when you give up your first amendment rights."
You’re not saying that a private company blocking content has anything to do with the First Amendment, right?
Banned*
I have not heard of the USA National Government trying to ban this picture.what happens when you disarm a nation
For some reason (could it be that Zuck doesn't want to offend his Chinese investors) this photo of the aftermath of Tiananmen Square has been banned on Facebook, just as it is in China. Today is the day that thousands of people all across America are posting this Tiananmen Square photo on all social media platforms as a 2A message of "this is what happens when you disarm a population." However, with Facebook censoring this photo you could also make the claim - "this is what happens when you give up your first amendment rights."
Were the comedian's misspelled words and incorrect grammar suppose to be funny?
Dumb all over, a little ugly on the side.That's not what he said.
I have not heard of the USA National Government trying to ban this picture.
Chinese citizens didn't exactly give up their rights to free speech.
LibTurd DemWits try to take away out 1st Amendment rights if they don't agree with the speech in question.