Would say, send your kids to robot fixing school, but they'll have robot-fixin' robots, and then......Genesis IS Skynet.I heard a rumor yesterday that they are trying to make more hubs automatic. It is sad. Makes me a little bit nervous about our future. Well actually alot nervous.
Would say, send your kids to robot fixing school, but they'll have robot-fixin' robots, and then......Genesis IS Skynet.
It isn't a rumor. It's happening here and now.I heard a rumor yesterday that they are trying to make more hubs automatic. It is sad. Makes me a little bit nervous about our future. Well actually alot nervous.
I heard that as well... Rubus™ Is one of the automated systems that are suppose to replace unloaders soon. It sucks as I am a unloader but I do understand technology advancement as it relates to efficiency. I can say I wouldn't mind operating a automatic system lol!I heard a rumor yesterday that they are trying to make more hubs automatic. It is sad. Makes me a little bit nervous about our future. Well actually alot nervous.
I heard that as well... Rubus™ Is one of the automated systems that are suppose to replace unloaders soon. It sucks as I am a unloader but I do understand technology advancement as it relates to efficiency. I can say I wouldn't mind operating a automatic system lol!
I would not worry about being replaced by a robot until that robot cost less then $10/hr to operate. I am guessing they cost hundreds of dollars an hour right now.I heard that as well... Rubus™ Is one of the automated systems that are suppose to replace unloaders soon. It sucks as I am a unloader but I do understand technology advancement as it relates to efficiency. I can say I wouldn't mind operating a automatic system lol!
Your assuming the human and the robot have equal productivity. Not the case. Plus, you also assume our expense for a new unloader is the $10/HR salary. Also, not true.I would not worry about being replaced by a robot until that robot cost less then $10/hr to operate. I am guessing they cost hundreds of dollars an hour right now.
I am assuming the human can out perform the robot and when the human breaks you just throw him away. The biggest expense for the $10 unloader is finding enough workers to work for $10/hr.Your assuming the human and the robot have equal productivity. Not the case. Plus, you also assume our expense for a new unloader is the $10/HR salary. Also, not true.
The rubus mentioned above is a different methology entirely for unloading. It has been demonstrated to unload as much as 10-12 people, with one person operating it with a joystick.I am assuming the human can out perform the robot and when the human breaks you just throw him away. The biggest expense for the $10 unloader is finding enough workers to work for $10/hr.
I am still wondering who will be able to afford to consume all these goods and services that will be produced by robots when fewer people have an income.
In an optimistic view, everyone can have everything they need working 20 hours a week, because automation does make everyone more productive collectively.
In the pessimistic view, people live in tent cities while robot owners are trillionaires.
Vote carefully...