exactly, get caught in a Post Office with a CCW because you didn't know... yea, good luck
Hilary Clinton
- Thread starter moreluck
- Start date
exactly, get caught in a Post Office with a CCW because you didn't know... yea, good luck
Sportello
Well-Known Member
Once again, the threshold for prosecution in this instance is not that simple.
I was hoping she'd get indicted and Trump would be too, for tax evasion.
You can always dream...
Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
Any person that thinks she's an honest ethical human being has lost their mind.
Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
Sportello
Well-Known Member
I'm pretty sure the Second Amendment does not have any limitations, and ignorance of the law always works well with well known Federal precident.
This case (the on topic one) is really nuanced. Do you also want Powell, Rice and Petraeus indicted, along with the entire GWB administration? Toss them all in jail? Cut off their government benefits? Let them eat cake?
Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
Sportello
Well-Known Member
@Brownslave688, you are totally missing the legality of what your memes seem to imply. We are, after all, a nation of laws.
Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
They are memes. Relax
who set the precedent?
Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
By legality do you mean to imply that there wasn't enough evidence?
I mean we don't really believe that do we?
Sportello
Well-Known Member
By legality I mean that what she did was exactly what the FBI reported, and it did not meet the same threshold as your misleading memes implied.
Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
Lmao. Good one.
MrFedEx
Engorged Member
Just like all politicians. Trump is as pure as the driven snow, however. Now all the Republitards have left is Benhgazi, Benghazi, Benghazi!! Watch for a massive re-emphasis on making Ambassador Stevens a martyr for the Right Wing cause.
Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
I'm
Not a huge trump fan either.
This isnt even remotely over. She's gonna get drilled over this right up until Election Day. Even though the FBI chose not to recommend charges they basically said anyone with a shred of common would of known better.
Yeah that's who we want running the country. Smh.
MAKAVELI
Banned
She may get drilled, but just like most women, they can take a good drilling and come back for more. Men on the other
, well you know what happens to men in prison that take a drilling.
Babagounj
Strength through joy
You think this is going away , you fool .
The FBI has just declared that the good old USA is dead and people with power & money now are exempt from all the laws you and I can be punished for .
So tell the whole class now TOS , how does it feel not to be a 1%er ?
Babagounj
Strength through joy
Here's a twist to think about .
Court: Officials can't use private email accounts to evade records laws
Federal officials may not use private email accounts to get around public records laws, a federal judge ruled on Tuesday.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit overturned a lower court decision in which judges dismissed claims from the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), a conservative think tank that attempted to obtain correspondence from a top White House official through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
The White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) said it did not need to search for or turn over records held by the head of the OSTP on a private email account as part of the open records request.
In addition to official White House email, John Holdren, the director of the OSTP, also sent and received emails from a domain at the Woods Hole Research Center.
Throughout the case, the government argued that “[d]ocuments on a nongovernmental email server are outside the possession or control of federal agencies, and thus beyond the scope of FOIA.”
“If a department head can deprive the citizens of their right to know what his department is up to by the simple expedient of maintaining his departmental emails on an account in another domain, that purpose is hardly served,” said Judge David Sentelle, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
“It would make as much sense to say that the department head could deprive requestors of hard-copy documents by leaving them in a file at his daughter’s house and then claiming that they are under her control,” he said.
Court: Officials can't use private email accounts to evade records laws
Federal officials may not use private email accounts to get around public records laws, a federal judge ruled on Tuesday.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit overturned a lower court decision in which judges dismissed claims from the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), a conservative think tank that attempted to obtain correspondence from a top White House official through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
The White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) said it did not need to search for or turn over records held by the head of the OSTP on a private email account as part of the open records request.
In addition to official White House email, John Holdren, the director of the OSTP, also sent and received emails from a domain at the Woods Hole Research Center.
Throughout the case, the government argued that “[d]ocuments on a nongovernmental email server are outside the possession or control of federal agencies, and thus beyond the scope of FOIA.”
“If a department head can deprive the citizens of their right to know what his department is up to by the simple expedient of maintaining his departmental emails on an account in another domain, that purpose is hardly served,” said Judge David Sentelle, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
“It would make as much sense to say that the department head could deprive requestors of hard-copy documents by leaving them in a file at his daughter’s house and then claiming that they are under her control,” he said.
Similar threads
