Next Day Err
Well-Known Member
Let’s hear Hunter’s side of the story in a PUBLIC hearing. Or wait… why doesn’t the Republican Party want him to speak publicly?
Hunter Biden is going DOWN!
- Thread starter BlackFriday
- Start date
Only thing that matters is what the present in an impeachment hearing. We'll see how it goes. I'm guessing a lot more than an anonymous hearsay witness.
Why did Democrats have closed door depositions? Because it's standard procedure. Good luck.
Next Day Err
Well-Known Member
The difference is Hunter called their bluff. They originally demanded an open hearing.
Okey dokey. We'll see.
Next Day Err
Well-Known Member
Face it. The Republicans is the dog who caught the car.
Fred's Myth
Nonhyphenated American
So you normally lie?
newolddude
Well-Known Member
Im a liberal so I always lie. Unlike you conservatives who are paragons of truth and virtue.
newolddude
Well-Known Member
True, with so many clowns in that little car it's hard to get a grip on it.
BrownFlush
Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
You're no liberal,
You're an extreme leftist loon.
oldngray
nowhere special
Hunter Biden’s direct payments to father coincided with Chinese transfers, bank inquiries
The newly disclosed payment from Hunter Biden's Owasco PC directly to Joe Biden uncovered by the Oversight Committee occurred while Hunter Biden was still receiving payments from a joint venture with a Chinese company with communist party connections. At the same time, Wells Fargo compliance...
justthenews.com
Next Day Err
Well-Known Member
Hunter called their bluff on the public hearing and that’s how I’m pretty dang sure there was no impropriety. Keep reaching though.
You really are in denial. At this point I'm waiting for the impeachment proceeding. You can see the evidence presented then. I've already.repeated, numerous times, what the oversight committees are saying they've found and continue to discover. I provided their website detailing their findings. I suspect it'll be well into next year before the impeachment. Good luck!
Next Day Err
Well-Known Member
I hope the GQP overreaches like they often do.
Says a Democrat whose party based a two year investigation of Russian collusion on a phony dossier and impeached a president over a phone call with an anonymous hearsay witness.
Next Day Err
Well-Known Member
You manage to mischaracterize and outright butcher facts again in just a single sentence. Wow.
Prove me wrong.
Next Day Err
Well-Known Member
This is false. We've went over this. The FBI had already began their Trump campaign investigation before they had even addressed the Steele documentation. I'm not going to swat away every one of your revisionist history pieces.
The FBI presented the Steele Dossier to the FISA court, even called it verified when it wasn't, as a supporting document to get warrants to spy on the Trump campaign and then during the transition. This has been gone over too. So much so that the Inspector General pointed it out and caused the FISA court to sternly rebuke the FBI. The FBI 4th in command warned the FBI leadership that the dossier couldn't be corroborated but that didn't stop Comey and McCabe from signing off that it had been verified. If you aren't happy with this timeline take it up with the Inspector General.
