zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
I agree with all of that. Nothing is going to blow up, and I'm for all business activity.
I just think that for example, if we pull hydrocarbons out of the ground and burn them, part of the cost of doing that should be to recapture it and dispose of it into the ground, not toss it into the air.
If we do that, then by all means, burn all you want. But it's foolish to think we're not having an effect on climate.
Under the fossil fuel theory all that carbon was in the atmosphere at one point anyway. Sequestering carbon decreases the energy effeciency of burning hydrocarbons by 50 to 75%. With some of the methods being considered, failures of the sequestering system could be lethal to anything living nearby. I personally like the approach of recycling carbon out of the atmosphere into new, usable, hydrocarbons. If this technology could replace pulling hydrocarbons out of the ground, we could reach an equilibrium in carbon emissions and stabilize carbondioxide concentration in the atmosphere.
Proven one-step process to convert CO2 and water directly into liquid hydrocarbon fuel
This system solves the renewable energy storage issue, and allows us to maintain our current energy infrastructure. I like win/win solutions.