tourists24
Well-Known Member
No sillier than goo to you believing but we’ve covered that
LGBTQ
- Thread starter moreluck
- Start date
El Correcto
god is dead
You got an article refuting evolution I’ll read it, but last book suggestion I got in here from someone I disagreed with was a waste of ten bucks. Couldn’t even make it through the first chapter without highlighting everything that was wrong with it.
Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
Humanity has progressed so far that we are aware of more that we don't know than in any point in history.
El Correcto
god is dead
It absolutely is. You can take evolution to the edge of our understanding and place you feet demanding more evidence while throwing away the entire thing because it doesn’t prove it all down to the initial spark, or you can grow up and recognize facts are facts even if they don’t have the entire picture.
It’s like looking at half the Mono Lisa and saying you believe it is a goat woman because the other half has horns.
tourists24
Well-Known Member
I imagine you’ll have issues with this one to. But it’s not pseudoscience. It’s the exact same data that scientists you agree with. Only getting different conclusions. There is also a Refuting Evolution 2. It’s probably a better read and more to the point.
Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
@Wrong is trying to serve you a fruit salad with tomatoes in it.
His argument is that a tomato is a fruit ...
El Correcto
god is dead
I’m not reading a 143 pages of junk. Post an article you find compelling I’ll read it. But I’m not spending money because you think the mono Lisa is a goat woman.
tourists24
Well-Known Member
It’s not factual if you can’t prove it. Just like expecting me to believe that humankind came from goo yet can’t show me how it occurred.
El Correcto
god is dead
Post an article friend, I’ll hear out your science. But every other professional in the field disagrees with you. I can’t find a single scientific journal proposing anything pushing creationism.
El Correcto
god is dead
Like I said you jump to the theoretical side ignoring the factual, then plant your feet demanding evidence for the theoretical and tossing out the factual side along with it. Then you ignorantly place god there saying your feelings tell you it’s the truth.
tourists24
Well-Known Member
You don’t wanna read it, then don’t. But here’s a scientist. He’s not the only one. Any journal you want wouldn’t be good enough either
El Correcto
god is dead
I mean I’d be thrilled to bits to go to Hell if that meant my family got to go to heaven for their belief in god. I just don’t see any evidence for it and strongly disagree with it.
El Correcto
god is dead
Post an article. I don’t see why you won’t, I’ll post articles you refuse to even look at, I’m not sure why. You’re so sure you’re correct.
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
It’s been exhaustively presented, the gaps aren’t as important as is the genetic drift. The connections are all there, and the Theory of Evolution is as rock-solid as the Theory of Gravity.
It’s ok if you don’t want to believe in science, that’s your choice.
If you’re unwilling or unable to do your own research into the research that’s already been done, that’s on you.
Let me ask you a question:
What if what the extensive evidence that has been shown to be true is true, but the explanation is that we’re just now uncovering the details of how God ‘did it’.
Would you buy it then?
God and science don’t need to be incompatible, but you’re railing against something that you don’t fully understand (the Science, with extensive real-world evidence) and throwing your weight behind something that you don’t fully understand (God, evidence comes from a book).
Ok
El Correcto
god is dead
It actually isnt incompatible because the Bible sets a timeline and explains how it was done. Their silly book is false and so is their god.
Last edited:
tourists24
Well-Known Member
Unlike you, I’m reading yours.
tourists24
Well-Known Member
Yes the gaps are important. How can it be rock solid if you can’t prove it? It’s not on me to prove my challenge because I’ve tried and can’t find it. Nor can anyone else because I do want to see the connections from goo to you. Just from one example: humans. You can’t skip millions of years, make another connection and claim it to be fact
El Correcto
god is dead
No one is claiming it to be fact, that’s the theoretical side of RNA world. You are the one claiming evolution isn’t fact.
tourists24
Well-Known Member
Not at all. Evolution itself does occur (read the book lol), just not in the way it’s presented i.e.- goo to you
El Correcto
god is dead
Yeah no one thinks that’s fact and it’s easy to push pseudoscience in with theoretical or not commonly understood things such as quantum mechanics. That doesn’t mean God is the creator.