I think some kind of pension buyout is very likely. Hard to tell when though. But I doubt it will be an early retirement offer, just a way to terminate the defined benefit pension plan. But it's likely to be structured so you'll get screwed it you leave before retirement age. Make no mistake, they want you to leave before retirement age. They just want to keep a big chunk of the money you've earned when you do. Just like the new "improved" MIP. MIP used to be a bonus. They turned it into a way to bone us. Rest assured, the new "improved" retirement plan will be more of the same.Let me get this straight though- we're talking about all management being eligible this time- and possibly starting in April? How high is confidence in this happening??
. They just want to keep a big chunk of the money you've earned when you do. Just like the new "improved" MIP. MIP used to be a bonus. They turned it into a way to bone us. Rest assured, the new "improved" retirement plan will be more of the same.
I think some kind of pension buyout is very likely. Hard to tell when though. But I doubt it will be an early retirement offer, just a way to terminate the defined benefit pension plan. But it's likely to be structured so you'll get screwed it you leave before retirement age. Make no mistake, they want you to leave before retirement age. They just want to keep a big chunk of the money you've earned when you do. Just like the new "improved" MIP. MIP used to be a bonus. They turned it into a way to bone us. Rest assured, the new "improved" retirement plan will be more of the same.
If you leave before you're 55 you get 40% of your retirement benefits and no medical. I don't have any inside info on any pension plan changes. But defined benefit plans are all dead men walking IMHO. They're too much of an unpredictable liability for companies to keep them. And UPS has already demonstrated that it's more than willing to screw current managers, especially grades 19 and below, for any available short term bottom line gains. BTW, what IBM did resulted in a class action suit against them by the people who got screwed. I imagine the same will happen at UPS. The "partnership" is but a distant memory both from a financial perspective and from a teamwork perspective.As the retirement plan is now , if you leave before 55, you get your retirement pay, but not health benefits. Your information has been going around for a couple of years.
Not saying it won't happen, as some large corporations ( I think IBM was one) got rid of the traditional pension plan and turned the monies over to the employees. No administrative costs, and allowing the employee to invest as they choose. Bad deal, not so sure.
No, I'm not a current employee. Spent 27 years at UPS and stay in touch with some co workers and fellow retireesChannahon,
You seem to know too much and sound like a current management employee of UPS. Are you pulling our chain by saying that you're a former employee?
The IBM did resulted in a class action suit against them by the people who got screwed. I imagine the same will happen at UPS. The "partnership" is but a distant memory both from a financial perspective and from a teamwork perspective.[/quote
Here are the people who got screwed by IBM. If and when UPS changes the retirement plan, I would think some research would be done
What does the July 31, 2003 decision in the IBM Pension lawsuit mean?
A: The judge found that several aspects of IBM’s 1995 plan (the Pension Credit Formula, or PCF plan) and IBM’s 1999 Cash Balance plan violate certain rules set forth by ERISA (the Employees Retirement Income Security Act), the federal law that governs pension plans. Both plans were found to discriminate against older employees. Under the PCF plan, if two employees of different ages were hired on the same day, and worked the same number of years and received the same salary, the younger employee would receive a larger pension benefit than the older employee. This is illegal under ERISA. For a similar set of employees in the cash balance plan, the benefit accrual rate for older employees was found to be less than for younger employees. Again, under ERISA, this is illegal. The judge also found that the formula that IBM used to calculate the opening balance for the cash balance plan, called ‘Always Cash Balance,’ caused the younger of two employees with equal years of service to be credited with a higher opening balance. The judge ruled that this was also illegal under ERISA.
Does this mean that all cash balance plans are illegal?
A: Although statements from IBM and some pension consultants have made such a claim, the judge’s decision applies only to IBM’s plan. Not all cash balance plans work the same way or use the same formula as IBM’s plan. Each plan needs to be looked at individually to determine if it has similar problems. Some plans could have the same problem as IBM’s and therefore could also be found to be illegal. The ruling in the IBM case came from a federal district court, and district courts in other parts of the country could reach different conclusions for other companies’ plans, even if they work the same way as IBM’s. This is one reason that many experts believe that this case will ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court. A decision from the Supreme Court would apply to all companies nation wide.
Be careful what you wish for! Many companies have been simplifying their pension plans in recent years....... plan as it exist now is made up of a whole lot of formulas that are used to calculate years of service, benefits years and a couple of other formulas to determine...your actual pension...
Wish they would simplify the whole thing!
You mean, there were 194 happy ex-employees. It took me about three days to forget about three years of madeira whine (if you know what I mean.)there were 194 happy employees retiring today.......
Are you referring to someone in IS whose name is very close to Madeira and who looks like Rick Moranis? I know exactly who you mean.You mean, there were 194 happy ex-employees. It took me about three days to forget about three years of madeira whine (if you know what I mean.)
Remember, if they are shareholder ex-employees, then they still own a piece of the truck and can and should freely express their opinions, as owners of the company, at shareholder meetings (without fear of reprisal from medeira).