TeltBender
Well-Known Member
$44 an hour is pretty lowMaybe. But I’ll be making over $44 an hour pretty soon, and you’ll still be a part time cock licker making less than $75 a day.
$44 an hour is pretty lowMaybe. But I’ll be making over $44 an hour pretty soon, and you’ll still be a part time cock licker making less than $75 a day.
in what world?$44 an hour is pretty low
$44 an hour is pretty low
The NBA?in what world?
Huh?31.00 + for 10-15 year Part timer
No it’s not enough, because in 5 years 100k is gonna equal what 50k was 3 years agoSo, by the end of the contract, over 100 grand on 40 hour weeks, with no OT, and its not enough? Lord help us!
No it’s not enough, because in 5 years 100k is gonna equal what 50k was 3 years ago
.....Are you expecting runaway inflation or.....?No it’s not enough, because in 5 years 100k is gonna equal what 50k was 3 years ago
If he’s right, money will be the least of our problems.....Are you expecting runaway inflation or.....?
SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHBy the end of this contract, $100,000/year will most likely be equal to $70,000/year in 2020. If not less.
That’s because we are all underpaid like $3 an hour or more as it is. A 7.50 raise for PT by 2027 isn’t enough when your starting point is already dog . And then on top of that not bringing up those with years worked already. Plain and simple$7.50-$9.00 in raises over 5 years is unheard of. SOB took care of the pt pay issue.
No. Idc if a new hire makes $21 an hr. But a know a close to 10 year employee shouldn’t be making $21.50 because that is what is weird not to mention they are underpaid once again. Pretty common sense at any job. Point me to a job where a 9 year employee only makes 50 cents more than someone on their second day. Guys who started in 2019 and worked thru Covid are making the same as new hires. Do you understand nowIt seems like the main argument against this contract is that the raises for new hires are too much. The guy that was hired after me should be making a lot less than me is a weird argument.
Ever worked retail?Point me to a job where a 9 year employee only makes 50 cents more than someone on their second day.
Point me to a job where a 9 year employee only makes 50 cents more than someone on their second day.
I understand PT work here was designed to be transient. I understand that you haven't offered any valuable skill that a PTer at 30 days doesn't offer. You should all make the same.No. Idc if a new hire makes $21 an hr. But a know a close to 10 year employee shouldn’t be making $21.50 because that is what is weird not to mention they are underpaid once again. Pretty common sense at any job. Point me to a job where a 9 year employee only makes 50 cents more than someone on their second day. Guys who started in 2019 and worked thru Covid are making the same as new hires. Do you understand now
Nah, I’m wouldn’t care making the same as a new guy if I’m adequately paid, like what’s happening now with MRA. What sucks is still being underpaid AND making same as a new hireIt seems like the main argument against this contract is that the raises for new hires are too much. The guy that was hired after me should be making a lot less than me is a weird argument.
Ok and do top rate full timers offer a valuable skill that someone in their second year doesn’t? No but that’s job how jobs work you do it longer you make more. Whenever a contract raises the new minimum start pay for drivers then that’s what you should all make then. Never progress beyond that since that’s your logic and since you’re not $20 an hr more valuable than a first year driver.I understand PT work here was designed to be transient. I understand that you haven't offered any valuable skill that a PTer at 30 days doesn't offer. You should all make the same.
I'm definitely not, we should get paid the same, progression should be a year, two at most. A four-year driver makes what a thirty-four driver makes, is that unfair?S
Ok and do top rate full timers offer a valuable skill that someone in their second year doesn’t? No but that’s job how jobs work you do it longer you make more. Whenever a contract raises the new minimum start pay for drivers then that’s what you should all make then. Never progress beyond that since that’s your logic and since you’re not $20 an hr more valuable than a first year driver.
Unionism 101. Same job for same pay.No. Idc if a new hire makes $21 an hr. But a know a close to 10 year employee shouldn’t be making $21.50 because that is what is weird not to mention they are underpaid once again. Pretty common sense at any job. Point me to a job where a 9 year employee only makes 50 cents more than someone on their second day. Guys who started in 2019 and worked thru Covid are making the same as new hires. Do you understand now