Only 5% of next car purchasers expect to buy all electric cars-Road and Track.

Ou812fu

Polishing toilet bowls since 1966.
You read about how kids that look nothing like that do some mining that looks nothing like that, in a country thousands of miles away, for a device irrelevant to this thread.

You should stop reading. It doesn't help.

Lefty.
You are calling people lefty? You are a complete lefty. With the way you look down at people
 

newolddude

Well-Known Member

Musk admitted Hyperloop was about getting legislators to cancel plans for high-speed rail in California. He had no plans to build it Musk said public transit was “a pain in the ass” where you’re surrounded by strangers, including possible serial killers
 

Non liberal

Well-Known Member
And cell phones.

And you didn't know that.

Because you thought you didn't employ those kids.

You do.
I did know that. Cellphone companies aren’t really pretending they’re going to save the world though either like the electric car companies seem to think. Making batteries for everyone’s car will only increase the number of kids being sold into slavery, why would anyone want to do that? Kids in slavery die from the working conditions anyway, making $1 an hr. You need to stop thinking it’s ok by telling yourself your feeding these poor children and their families. You’re not.
 

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
I did know that. Cellphone companies aren’t really pretending they’re going to save the world though either like the electric car companies seem to think. Making batteries for everyone’s car will only increase the number of kids being sold into slavery, why would anyone want to do that? Kids in slavery die from the working conditions anyway, making $1 an hr. You need to stop thinking it’s ok by telling yourself your feeding these poor children and their families. You’re not.
You, again, fail to understand basic economics. Without this work, they are resigned to a worse fate.
In this one, there is capital flowing into the country, and if they fix the political situation, then the kid can have a real life.

Without the capital inflow, there is no chance of it whatsoever.

So, you want to take the only lifeline they have? That spending is it. There is no other lifeline.
You complain about their pay, but you want to pay them 0 instead. You are not capable of paying them more, and nobody in the world is capable of paying them more. That's because they live under tinpot dictators who steal it.

You have NO plan, and you're mad at the people that make it a little viable if they fix the politics.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member

Screenshot_20220810-135100_Firefox.jpg
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member

View attachment 395509
We already have self driving...its called public transport

Too bad it sucks so bad here compared to eu
 

Commercial Inside Release

Well-Known Member
While the software is stupidly named, because it gives the public the idea the car can drive itself, that is not at all the case if you RTFM. Tesla's software is written to ignore stationary objects, they are the responsibility of the person behind the steering wheel. It only recognizes objects that are moving in the same direction as the car. That is why they only recommend using the system on divided one-way highway systems, with exits. As a result, any pedestrian standing in the road will get run over. This has been already explained in court, and Tesla won the 10-20 cases, because the drivers didn't read the manual or understand how the system works, and they ignored the warnings.

Many of these accidents were YouTubers showing off what the software could do, without understanding anything about how it works... Until they slammed into a stationary object at highway speeds. PBS Frontline did a show that explains exactly this situation, and I suspect Nader & that group trying to ban Teslas latched on to the situation after hearing the details. Tesla won in court so far, because people do stupid things with the cars, but this group knows they can use public outrage and suspicion to steamroll Tesla into changing or eliminating the software.

My opinion is, people are far too stupid to be trusted to pay attention, when using the software. (Especially, after seeing videos of two dozen of them slamming into objects at highway speed, and resulting in their own fatality.) A couple went underneath tractor-trailers that pulled onto the highway in front of them, and we're not just decapitated, but their head and upper body were completely obliterated!
 

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
While the software is stupidly named, because it gives the public the idea the car can drive itself, that is not at all the case if you RTFM. Tesla's software is written to ignore stationary objects, they are the responsibility of the person behind the steering wheel. It only recognizes objects that are moving in the same direction as the car. That is why they only recommend using the system on divided one-way highway systems, with exits. As a result, any pedestrian standing in the road will get run over. This has been already explained in court, and Tesla won the 10-20 cases, because the drivers didn't read the manual or understand how the system works, and they ignored the warnings.

Many of these accidents were YouTubers showing off what the software could do, without understanding anything about how it works... Until they slammed into a stationary object at highway speeds. PBS Frontline did a show that explains exactly this situation, and I suspect Nader & that group trying to ban Teslas latched on to the situation after hearing the details. Tesla won in court so far, because people do stupid things with the cars, but this group knows they can use public outrage and suspicion to steamroll Tesla into changing or eliminating the software.

My opinion is, people are far too stupid to be trusted to pay attention, when using the software. (Especially, after seeing videos of two dozen of them slamming into objects at highway speed, and resulting in their own fatality.) A couple went underneath tractor-trailers that pulled onto the highway in front of them, and we're not just decapitated, but their head and upper body were completely obliterated!
The software is already safer than every driver on this forum, and has a lower per-mile accident rate in auto pilot than our circle of honor drivers.

Links would be helpful for some of the nonsense you think occurred.
You are describing events that happened about 20 generations ago on the software.
 
Top