Orlando night club shooting

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
Is there a deep secret within you that you are trying to get out ?
Did some older white man touch you when you were younger and it made you feel uncomfortable ?

Sorry charlie, just calling out your bretheren for what they are.

I cant help that white men seem to have a psychological disorder that gives them a proclivity to rape women more than all the other races combined.

YOU, and your kind are the one thing american women have to fear long before a syrian refugee.

TOS.
 

Johney

Pineapple King
Speaking of ignorance, the shooter didnt start shooting anyone for at least an hour while he gathered people up at gunpoint and was talking to the police.

He started shooting once he had them gathered like sheep. All he had to do then, was keep firing without reloading until he wiped them all out.

Had the shooter been forced to reload after 10 rounds manually, the death toll wouldnt have been so high, but of course, numskullz like you would rather a terrorist have access to 100 round drum mags and trigger modifications, just so you could have one decorating your walls that you will never use.

The ignorance is YOURS pops.

TOS.
Hey numskull, did you not hear interviews with survivors that they could hear him reloading? Not just changing magazines,but reloading the magazines they said they could hear the bullets dropping on the floor. No he didn't start shooting after an hour there is phone video of him shooting while people were still listening to music and sitting at tables partying. The more you post the bigger of an fool you become.
 

bottomups

Bad Moon Risen'
13445809_10154300436895990_5184936245183059952_n.jpg
From what I recall growing up in Catholic church and schools, the bible sure condoned stoning non-believers and adulterers. Guess neither religion is perfect.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Had the shooter been forced to reload after 10 rounds manually, the death toll wouldnt have been so high, but of course, numskullz like you would rather a terrorist have access to 100 round drum mags and trigger modifications, just so you could have one decorating your walls that you will never use.

The ignorance is YOURS pops.

TOS.
this may be your dumbest most ignorant argument yet. And this comment has a lot of competition from your previous comments.
 

realbrown1

Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
From what I recall growing up in Catholic church and schools, the bible sure condoned stoning non-believers and adulterers. Guess neither religion is perfect.
When is the last time you heard of a Christian stoning non-believers or adulterers?

When is the last time you heard of a Muslim killing non-believers?

Think before you post.

Then maybe you won't sound so stupid.
 

realbrown1

Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
There is no misconception. If the shooter had to eject a magazine, reload and reset the firing mechanism, somebody may have been able to stop him.

But WE all know, that if a shooter can have a 50 or 75 round magazine, and knows how to fire the weapon and prevent jamming the weapon, he will be able to kill many people without the hope of stopping him.

10 round mags would save lives.

Fixed magazines with 10 rounds will save lives.

Banning ALL assault style weapons will save lives.

Thats the key to saving lives.

TOS.
You mean the shooter would have obeyed a law the said you can't have an assault weapon?

Like he obeyed a law saying you can't murder people?

And a 10 round magazine law would have saved lives?

Like it did in Paris, France?

Where all guns, magazines, ammunition and murder are against the law, yet over 130 people were murdered by assault weapons with magazines and ammunition that were against the law.

If they are willing to break the law to murder people, what makes you think they won't break any law limiting firearms, magazines and ammunition?

And any law limiting firearms will be about as effective of our laws limiting illegal drugs.

Answer if you can, but we both know you can't.
 

bottomups

Bad Moon Risen'
When is the last time you heard of a Christian stoning non-believers or adulterers?

When is the last time you heard of a Muslim killing non-believers?

Think before you post.

Then maybe you won't sound so stupid.
You want to see stupid go look in the mirror. You are the one who posts a meme stating that the quran actually tells you to kill people. I simply stated that the bible promotes the same thing. Simple fact.
 

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
You mean the shooter would have obeyed a law the said you can't have an assault weapon?

Like he obeyed a law saying you can't murder people?

And a 10 round magazine law would have saved lives?

Like it did in Paris, France?

Where all guns, magazines, ammunition and murder are against the law, yet over 130 people were murdered by assault weapons with magazines and ammunition that were against the law.

If they are willing to break the law to murder people, what makes you think they won't break any law limiting firearms, magazines and ammunition?

And any law limiting firearms will be about as effective of our laws limiting illegal drugs.

Answer if you can, but we both know you can't.

Ya, and if it wasnt for an american gun dealer, those terrorists wouldnt have had the mini ak47's they used, the terrorists didnt get their weapons in France, but rather, from illegal sales from gun dealers around the world, including the good ole USA.

TOS.
 

realbrown1

Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
Ya, and if it wasnt for an american gun dealer, those terrorists wouldnt have had the mini ak47's they used, the terrorists didnt get their weapons in France, but rather, from illegal sales from gun dealers around the world, including the good ole USA.

TOS.
Thank you for making my point about Islamic terrorists being willing to break any law to accomplish murdering us infedels.
 

realbrown1

Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
You want to see stupid go look in the mirror. You are the one who posts a meme stating that the quran actually tells you to kill people. I simply stated that the bible promotes the same thing. Simple fact.
Is it really the same thing?

In the old testiment, stoning is authorized if a guilty verdict at a trial with at least 2 witnesses testified against the accused for a few crimes such as murder.

A person, or groups of people did not have this power.

Village Elders were the only ones who could try and convict a person.

And they were usually the ones who ended up throwing the stones after a guilty verdict.

Unless the family of the victim asked for permission to throw the stones.

A far cry from flying planes into the WTC or killing 49 people at a night club.

The Quran is Evil.

I think it's the book of Lucifer.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
Is it really the same thing?

In the old testiment, stoning is authorized if a guilty verdict at a trial with at least 2 witnesses testified against the accused for a few crimes such as murder.

A person, or groups of people did not have this power.

Village Elders were the only ones who could try and convict a person.

And they were usually the ones who ended up throwing the stones after a guilty verdict.

Unless the family of the victim asked for permission to throw the stones.

A far cry from flying planes into the WTC or killing 49 people at a night club.

The Quran is Evil.

I think it's the book of Lucifer.
Guess you've never read the book of Joshua.
 
Top