There is no misconception. If the shooter had to eject a magazine, reload and reset the firing mechanism, somebody may have been able to stop him.
But WE all know, that if a shooter can have a 50 or 75 round magazine, and knows how to fire the weapon and prevent jamming the weapon, he will be able to kill many people without the hope of stopping him.
10 round mags would save lives.
Fixed magazines with 10 rounds will save lives.
Banning ALL assault style weapons will save lives.
Thats the key to saving lives.
TOS.
You mean the shooter would have obeyed a law the said you can't have an assault weapon?
Like he obeyed a law saying you can't murder people?
And a 10 round magazine law would have saved lives?
Like it did in Paris, France?
Where all guns, magazines, ammunition and murder are against the law, yet over 130 people were murdered by assault weapons with magazines and ammunition that were against the law.
If they are willing to break the law to murder people, what makes you think they won't break any law limiting firearms, magazines and ammunition?
And any law limiting firearms will be about as effective of our laws limiting illegal drugs.
Answer if you can, but we both know you can't.