NO, it wasnt valid. It was modified several times to correct the record. It was invalidated when the amendments changed the original intentions. Again, another politically motivated cartoon filled with inaccuracies.
Peace.
Petition For Public Release of BHO's Birth Certificate
- Thread starter Babagounj
- Start date
NO, it wasnt valid. It was modified several times to correct the record. It was invalidated when the amendments changed the original intentions. Again, another politically motivated cartoon filled with inaccuracies.
Peace.
trplnkl
555
What original intentions were changed? I suggest the amendments were done to further the the intent of the original document by expounding parts that were left undefined. I'm pretty sure that the date and place of birth haven't been amended. Still valid, so far.
Redesigned 10 Commandments? Love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your mind, and with all your soul and love your neighbor as yourself. With a minor caveat of honesty, there are exactly zero loop-holes.
How about slavery for a starter?
How about women being unable to vote?
How about blacks being only 3/5ths of a man?
These ORIGINAL intentions were changed or REMOVED.
They were all DEFINED and clearly spelled out. The amendments corrected the errors of the original document.
peace.
trplnkl
555
All men are created equal, the intent is there, over time it became obvious that all mankind were not being treated as equals so the Amendments followed to assure that they would be. Still no change in the birth place or date of the original document with an intent to deceive. Just more valid.
BTW, none of the things you mention here are discussed in the Declaration of Independence.
You must be confusing the DoI with the Constitution.
wkmac
Well-Known Member
From a technical standpoint the picture is wrong in the sense that at the time of the Declaration, there was no Uncle Sam so to speak. The Declaration was a list of grievances of british subjects acting as rep's for certain independent british colonies and their populations who were in effect threatening secession from british rule. To accept their actions being in accordance with the majority of people in the colonies at the time IMO would be a far stretch. My opin is that this early movement was about as popular in general consensus as some variation of a 3rd party political effort is today in pure percentage of population numbers. People 8itched about their lives but few were the image of the grand American patriot that American mythology likes to portray.
What really got Uncle Sam started if you will was the Articles of Confederation and from that came the Constitution and there you go. But the actual idea of Uncle Sam first came about in the War of 1812' and the later in the name of the "public good" eg benefits the State storyline, the iconic character was molded into the beard old man dressed in red, white and blue we see today. Not unlike the image and idea of Santa Klaus was used to spread an idea and the consumption of consumer goods. The image has never been about freedom and liberty but about pure propaganda and then later thanks to Bernays and Lippmann now known a Public Relations or "spin" if you will.
As to the 10 Commandments, which one because there were in fact 2 recordings of them (Exodus 20 and Exodus 34) in your bible.
Is it in the by-laws of the Social Security Administration? Or maybe in the Constitution giving government broad powers to write laws as it sees fit?
In the Constitution giving government broad powers to enact laws as they see fit?
wkmac
Well-Known Member
Or if it's not there (vast majority of time it's not), no problem. Both parties when it comes to doing what they want regardless of the law, they take the Larry the Cable Guy theory to governance.
GIT-R-DONE!
Babagounj
Strength through joy
[h=3]DOWNLOADABLE FLYER DETAILS CRIMES COMMITTED BY OBAMA PUNISHABLE WITH PRISON TIME[/h](Jul. 12, 2011) — This is to notify you of a ‘high Crime’ criminal act that was recently performed (and is still ongoing to date) in plain sight before all of America, and that it now becomes incumbent upon every American Citizen so notified herewith that they have a civic duty to pursue prosecution of this crime, lest they themselves be chargeable with 18 USC Sec. 1028, Part I, Chapter 1, Section 4: Misprision of Felony.
On April 27, 2011, the person commonly known as (but without any proof thereof) Barack Hussein Obama (aka Barry Soetoro), did, with malice and aforethought, publicly display on the official White House website, a blatantly forged document that he claimed to be a copy of his Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth – in order to obtain and maintain his continued employment within our Federal Government. One of the crimes (among others) enabled by that forgery is Mispersonization of Identity – a crime punishable by up to 15 years in prison. And that same punishment would apply to all those who have aided and abetted in the commission of just this crime alone. NOTE: This publicly committed and ongoing crime has nothing to do with whether or not Mr. Obama/Soetoro is a natural born Citizen, as required by Article II of the Constitution to be eligible to the Office of President. The actual ‘Birth Certificate’ or location of birth, therefore, is irrelevant to this crime. This is not a ‘Birther’ issue.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/07/12/a-conspiracy-of-congress/
On April 27, 2011, the person commonly known as (but without any proof thereof) Barack Hussein Obama (aka Barry Soetoro), did, with malice and aforethought, publicly display on the official White House website, a blatantly forged document that he claimed to be a copy of his Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth – in order to obtain and maintain his continued employment within our Federal Government. One of the crimes (among others) enabled by that forgery is Mispersonization of Identity – a crime punishable by up to 15 years in prison. And that same punishment would apply to all those who have aided and abetted in the commission of just this crime alone. NOTE: This publicly committed and ongoing crime has nothing to do with whether or not Mr. Obama/Soetoro is a natural born Citizen, as required by Article II of the Constitution to be eligible to the Office of President. The actual ‘Birth Certificate’ or location of birth, therefore, is irrelevant to this crime. This is not a ‘Birther’ issue.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/07/12/a-conspiracy-of-congress/
Babagounj
Strength through joy
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalp...enior-moment-ill-be-turning-50-in-a-week.html
User Comments
None of us know when he has a birthday cuz we can't find his birth certificate either. :--(
UNPRESIDENTED
We’re remiss to dismiss and deride
Those who ask if Barack’s qualified:
If it cannot be sworn
That he is “natural born,”
Then Obama has something to hide.
Posted by: friend.R. Duplant ier
User Comments
None of us know when he has a birthday cuz we can't find his birth certificate either. :--(
UNPRESIDENTED
We’re remiss to dismiss and deride
Those who ask if Barack’s qualified:
If it cannot be sworn
That he is “natural born,”
Then Obama has something to hide.
Posted by: friend.R. Duplant ier
Babagounj
Strength through joy
CERTIFIGATE
Document details show typewriter had variable type way back in 1961?
NEW YORK – Unless the typewriter used to type Barack Obama's purported Hawaiian "Certificate of Live Birth" in 1961 was magically capable of producing different size and shaped images with the exact same key, the document released by the White House April 27 is a forgery, says a professional typographer with 50 years experience.
"Steel-stamped letters do not expand to larger sizes and morph into different styles of type," retired New York City typographer Paul Irey told WND.
"To get his letters, the forger must have understood that he needed to copy the old typewriter styles," he continued. "So the forger probably scanned a bunch of old birth certificates, without realizing that the letters in the old files were from different typewriter styles. That's why the letters in the forged document do not match each other."
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=322389#ixzz1SQeDwrEI
Document details show typewriter had variable type way back in 1961?
NEW YORK – Unless the typewriter used to type Barack Obama's purported Hawaiian "Certificate of Live Birth" in 1961 was magically capable of producing different size and shaped images with the exact same key, the document released by the White House April 27 is a forgery, says a professional typographer with 50 years experience.
"Steel-stamped letters do not expand to larger sizes and morph into different styles of type," retired New York City typographer Paul Irey told WND.
"To get his letters, the forger must have understood that he needed to copy the old typewriter styles," he continued. "So the forger probably scanned a bunch of old birth certificates, without realizing that the letters in the old files were from different typewriter styles. That's why the letters in the forged document do not match each other."
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=322389#ixzz1SQeDwrEI
