President Biden
- Thread starter Turdferguson
- Start date
Babagounj
Strength through joy
Offer them free housing in Centralia Pennsylvania.
newfie
Well-Known Member
does that come with ice cream?
newfie
Well-Known Member
make him retire to scanton so he's actually not a liar when he says he lived there.
No, but you get buried with a donkey.
DELACROIX
In the Spirit of Honore' Daumier
It would be appropriate to end this (Post) on page 666...
Babagounj
Strength through joy
Biden's legacy......
www.dailymail.co.uk
3.3 million 'warrantless searches' were made
Report details how banks worked with Biden WH to spy on Americans
The Biden administration worked with banks to 'spy' on Americans without a warrant, a stunning new congressional report charges.
3.3 million 'warrantless searches' were made
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
There’s probably some fine print at the banks saying they can do that. But if not they should be chargedBiden's legacy......
Report details how banks worked with Biden WH to spy on Americans
The Biden administration worked with banks to 'spy' on Americans without a warrant, a stunning new congressional report charges.
3.3 million 'warrantless searches' were made
UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
Communist bastards.Biden's legacy......
Report details how banks worked with Biden WH to spy on Americans
The Biden administration worked with banks to 'spy' on Americans without a warrant, a stunning new congressional report charges.
3.3 million 'warrantless searches' were made
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Biden's legacy......
Report details how banks worked with Biden WH to spy on Americans
The Biden administration worked with banks to 'spy' on Americans without a warrant, a stunning new congressional report charges.
3.3 million 'warrantless searches' were made
Wow.
Mass surveillance on citizens brought to you originally by George Bush and the patriot act. Disgusting the Biden administration used it as well.
They wanna know everything about us, but keep everything secret from us. Snowden was right.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Using evidence obtained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, 11 organized crime figures, including the heads of New York City's "Five Families", were indicted by United States AttorneyRudolph Giuliani under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) on charges including extortion, labor racketeering, and murder. Eight of them were convicted under RICO, and most were sentenced to 100 years in prison on January 13, 1987, the maximum possible sentence under that law.
www.businessinsider.com
And another guy who enjoyed the government being able to secretly listen to conversations Hoisted by his own petard. The ramifications of giving the government this kind of power unconstitutionally come back to bite everyone eventually.
Some former mobsters who were prosecuted by Rudy Giuliani are thrilled that the ex-Trump attorney got hit with RICO charges, mob lawyers say: report
Rudy Giuliani prosecuted some of New York City's most notorious crime families when he was a federal prosecutor in the 1980s.
www.businessinsider.com
- “A lawyer who represented prominent New York mobsters said his clients are "
ing thrilled."
And another guy who enjoyed the government being able to secretly listen to conversations Hoisted by his own petard. The ramifications of giving the government this kind of power unconstitutionally come back to bite everyone eventually.
Last edited:
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
yup, i think the establishment on both sides will often work together, and get their party to support something they think will hurt the other side, but will weaken their freedoms in the long run. We can’t let it happen with censorship online
I got nervous when I saw both sides supporting repealing section 230
It’s so much easier to do now too with both sides being so hyper political, people think with backwards logic, they work backwards to defend something their politician of choice supports and mould it to their beliefs, instead of thinking first independently if they believe it in or not. If their politician put it forward, they first agree with it and then work backwards to figure out why
It’s one of the things Republican voters are pretty good about is defending the second ammendment. Trump did more against gun rights than Obama did though and with very little pushback from his supporters, thankfully the courts struck him down though. He also did dumb stuff like banning flavored e cigs, which Biden did with menthol cigarettes, which is just as dumb and too much government over reach
Last edited:
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
He said, “take the guns and do the due process later”. There is no due process if you take someone’s rights away from them first.
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
Yea I was shocked how little outrage that statement got. “take the firearms first and then go to court, because that’s another system. Because a lot of times, by the time you go to court, it takes so long to go to court, to get the due process procedures. I like taking the guns early.”
Also banning bump stocks, but the courts overturned that
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
You obviously never listen to me
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
this is unrelated to trumps statements on guns, but your quote there reminds me of something I think about, and not sure how I feel about.
What about people in jail while going through courts to figure out if they’re guilty or not guilty. It’s kind of a weird system, because you’re rights are taken away before due process, in a way
Sometimes court cases take years, it’s just weird to think your rights being taken away and forced in a cell, and then found not guilty. Is there any sort of justice you receive after for your time?
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
What do you mean?
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Spent quite a while railing against it
Similar threads
