You’re assigning subjective meaning to an objective fact. You don’t need pleasurable reproduction for a species to be driven to reproduce.
Ask any biology teacher. Basic biology.
It’s sad you think this conversation is on par with scientific facts found in a biology classroom. It’s also sad the same cultists who deny biologists findings on evolution are now trying to summon biology to their defense in what is philosophical discussion about “purposes” of biology’s findings.
In other words you'll revise anything to bolster your argument and suit your purpose. Now that's sad.It’s sad you think this conversation is on par with scientific facts found in a biology classroom. It’s also sad the same cultists who deny biologists findings on evolution are now trying to summon biology to their defense in what is philosophical discussion about “purposes” of biology’s findings.
Purpose in biology is defining functions. The blood circulating through your veins isn’t morally good or bad. The adaptations of random gene mutations in evolution are not morally good or bad. They just are. Those are just the functions of life. Once you start assigning points to these functions you are stepping out of the objective and into the subjective. Biology is there to observe and document the functions, not to draw conclusions about their purpose.
Function (biology) - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Yes just as you will. Glad you’re catching onto subjective vs objective. We can both agree sex can lead to reproduction in heterosexuals
The professor educated us, unbeknownst him, he’s on browncafe. What a scholar
Be careful, we don’t want to ruin one of the best parts of Brown café, watching this guy, throw fits and make a fool of himself while we laugh at him. Lives in his moms basement, has no relationship, has no moral compass, has no money, has no children, but he is an authority on all of them. According to himThe professor educated us, unbeknownst him, he’s on browncafe. What a scholar
it’s hilariously entertaining.Which is an argument you would make to justify your choices. Sex is just sex, doesn't matter who it is with as long as they're consenting adults. Reproduction is just a side effect. What matters is achieving pleasure. And that pretty much sums up homosexuality. It's about carnal pleasure because it can never lead to biological reproduction. What's interesting is the shade constantly thrown at heterosexuals yet homosexuals can't exist unless heterosexuals reproduce. Biting the hand that feeds you.
The underbelly of homosexuality is to destroy that which they cannot do. They are jealous of heterosexual, families and reproduction. They will never be happy and never feel accepted until they destroy everything that they can’t have.
And nothing represents that more than seeking to influence minors without the parents knowledge and insisting that's their right.
I bet you’d call me a dentist if you caught me brushing my teeth. It’s sad the yocals see someone correcting someone on what a biological fact is as being some sort of scholar.The professor educated us, unbeknownst him, he’s on browncafe. What a scholar
But you don’t hate them?
washingtonmonthly.com
Not at all.
Republicans Say Inflation, Crime, and Immigration Are Out of Control. The Numbers Disagree. | Washington Monthly
Every day, good news overshadows the Republican presidential candidates’ talking points. The right-wing Cassandras need a new shtick.
* Inflation since last June down from 9.1 to 4.0%
* Border crossing from month prior down 70%
* Fentanyl seizure in ‘22 3x more than ‘20
* Murder in ‘23, to date, down 12%
Uh huh…
I don’t like to have sex with married men.
You’re full of it, you came on here said you had sex with a married man and then boasted about it and now you’re trying to pretend you didn’t you need to embrace who you are even if it’s ugly and sad.
