President Obama!

[av8torntn]

I don't support it, I just have a problem with misinformation.

I didn't claim that, I just assumed you wouldn't be too dense to infer the obvious. Apparently I was wrong.

You made a point built on a false statement not I chief.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

You made a point built on a false statement not I chief.

I made a point, you chose to nitpick at my wording in regards to an unrelated topic. You are the king of derailing.

I already fixed my post for you.... Move on man.

 

[MAKAVELI]

 

[av8torntn]

I made a point, you chose to nitpick at my wording in regards to an unrelated topic. You are the king of derailing.

I already fixed my post for you.... Move on man.

So when you claimed that the ACA required companies to provide health insurance and I linked to the governments site that disagreed with you and you then questioned if I had even read it, what you really meant was that the ACA doesn't require companies to provide insurance and I was correct but you just want to attack me for it?

That's strange thing without a doubt but you're the one who claims he doesn't like misinformation. Hmmmm

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Employers with 50 or more employees have to provide health insurance or make an Employer Shared Responsibility Payment under ACA, I'm not sure this "executive rule change" is much of a change at all. Some companies thought they could dump employees onto the exchange and the government would pick up the bill through the exchange subsidies. They were wrong.

There, fixed it, happy? Good lord your constant attempts to derail are exhausting.

I made a point, you chose to nitpick at my wording in regards to an unrelated topic. You are the king of derailing.

I already fixed my post for you.... Move on man.

 

[av8torntn]

By adding your "or pay a fine line" then your point makes no sense. You said they think they cannot dump people into government system and they can. The difference now is that if the employers gave money to purchase health insurance instead of purchasing it themselves it will be taxed on both ends instead of being tax free on the employees end.

Your entire point was that employers are forced to purchase health insurance for employees(before you added the unless they don't part). Your point was misinformation which you claim to dislike and we must assume that is also incorrect based on your posts here.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

By adding your "or pay a fine line" then your point makes no sense. You said they think they cannot dump people into government system and they can. The difference now is that if the employers gave money to purchase health insurance instead of purchasing it themselves it will be taxed on both ends instead of being tax free on the employees end.

Your entire point was that employers are forced to purchase health insurance for employees(before you added the unless they don't part). Your point was misinformation which you claim to dislike and we must assume that is also incorrect based on your posts here.

You're like a broken record.

 

[av8torntn]

You're like a broken record.

And you were still incorrect. So what's the point? The point is that you decided to inject yourself into something that you knew little about and could offer little more than propaganda.

 

[av8torntn]

It's not that I blame you for trying to change the subject from your failed propaganda to me. I find it a little amusing.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

And you were still incorrect. So what's the point? The point is that you decided to inject yourself into something that you knew little about and could offer little more than propaganda.

It's not that I blame you for trying to change the subject from your failed propaganda to me. I find it a little amusing.

You have issues man....

 

[bbsam]

Not according to the government.

https://www.healthcare.gov/do-i-have-to-offer-health-coverage-to-my-employees/

So to your libertarian senses, which one represents government intrusion? Forcing companies to provide insurance or not forcing them to do so? Welcome aboard.

 

[av8torntn]

So to your libertarian senses, which one represents government intrusion? Forcing companies to provide insurance or not forcing them to do so? Welcome aboard.

Remember when you were a kid and they told you there was no such thing as a dumb question? Well that wasn't true.

 

[wkmac]

So to your libertarian senses, which one represents government intrusion? Forcing companies to provide insurance or not forcing them to do so? Welcome aboard.

I've always seen AV8 as libertarian in the same way that Rand Paul is!

 

[Jones]

I've always seen AV8 as libertarian in the same way that Rand Paul is!

So basically an establishment republican?

 

[wkmac]

Seems to me Adam did a pretty good job of fleshing out how that whole narrative works.

 

[av8torntn]

I've always seen AV8 as libertarian in the same way that Rand Paul is!

The bad thing about some libertarians is they tend to be very judgmental of anyone who even slightly opposes one of their views. With that in mind I understand the Rand Paul position of being a little more tolerant and a little more inclusive.

 

[wkmac]

If you didn't make libertarians look so bad, they might not be so judgmental.

 

[av8torntn]

If you didn't make libertarians look so bad, they might not be so judgmental.

There is that. I'm positive all libertarians read brown cafe and are swayed by my opinions given how easily they tend to be swayed.

 

[roadrunner2012]

There is that. I'm positive all libertarians read brown cafe and are swayed by my opinions given how easily they tend to be swayed.

Whoosh!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[av8torntn]

Whoosh!!!!!!!!!!!

How long was that in the mod que?