President Trump

[Jones]

Cohens specialty seems to have been hiding affairs through payoffs/ intimidation, I wonder what kind of work he did for Hannity?

 

[moreluck]

Cohens specialty seems to have been hiding affairs through payoffs/ intimidation, I wonder what kind of work he did for Hannity?

Supposedly, Hannity has him on retainer and as yet hasn't 'used' him. Watch Hannity this evening and hear what he has to say.

 

[Box Ox]

Cohens specialty seems to have been hiding affairs through payoffs/ intimidation, I wonder what kind of work he did for Hannity?

And what kind of "state-run" media coverage has he been coordinating directly with the Trump administration via Cohen? LOLOLOLOL

 

[oldngray]

What in the search warrant would involve Hannity? It sounds like a lot of evidence seized will get thrown out.

 

[Box Ox]

What in the search warrant would involve Hannity? It sounds like a lot of evidence seized will get thrown out.

Doesn't matter if Hannity is charged with anything. He's been outed because Michael Cohen's lawyers tried to argue to the judge that privileged documents of his other clients would be compromised if investigators were allowed to go through their raid haul. And then the judge asked who his other clients were. Whoops! That alone is enough on the Hannity front. LOLOLOL

 

[Sportello]

What in the search warrant would involve Hannity? It sounds like a lot of evidence seized will get thrown out.

This episode is taking a strange turn.

Three clients and two of them involve a third party.

The writers have me hooked.

 

[oldngray]

Doesn't matter if Hannity is charged with anything. He's been outed because Michael Cohen's lawyers tried to argue to the judge that privileged documents of his other clients would be compromised if investigators were allowed to go through their raid haul. And then the judge asked who his other clients were. Whoops! That alone is enough on the Hannity front. LOLOLOL

Nothing to do with this case and attorney-client privilege should still apply.

 

[Box Ox]

This episode is taking a strange turn.

Three clients and two of them involve a third party.

The writers have me hooked.

Hannity's been rolling in mad pusillanimous, dawg! Don't buy that "third party" semantics stuff! LOL

 

[Box Ox]

Nothing to do with this case and attorney-client privilege should still apply.

Well, let's see if there was any provable illegal coordination that'd trigger the crime-fraud exception for Hannity also. Honestly don't really care what happens with that. But it's hilarious. Especially since Hannity has never disclosed his relationship with Cohen.

 

[oldngray]

Well, let's see if there was any provable illegal coordination that'd trigger the crime-fraud exception for Hannity also. Honestly don't really care what happens with that. But it's hilarious. Especially since Hannity has never disclosed his relationship with Cohen.

Why should he have discussed it?

 

[Box Ox]

Why should he have discussed it?

Because people should know that while he's opinion guy and not a journalist, the opinions he does spout are probably heavily influenced via direct coordination with the Trump Administration, and/or his silencing of his side pusillanimous.

 

[oldngray]

Because people should know that while he's opinion guy and not a journalist, the opinions he does spout are probably heavily influenced via direct coordination with the Trump Administration, and/or his silencing of his side pusillanimous.

He asks a lawyer for advice. Probably on issues unrelated to Trump.

 

[Box Ox]

He asks a lawyer for advice. Probably on issues unrelated to Trump.

Come on, dawg! You know it's gotta be deeper than that if Cohen is calling him a client in front of a federal judge!

 

[MAKAVELI]

He asks a lawyer for advice. Probably on issues unrelated to Trump.

The very same lawyer for drumpf and others that have had him sign NDA agreements. Yeah that's just a coincidence. Lol

 

[oldngray]

Come on, dawg! You know it's gotta be deeper than that if Cohen is calling him a client in front of a federal judge!

Legally he would be a client if he just asked for advice. No need for a contract or fees to be paid to create a client situation. It was probably about the lawsuit Hannity was going through at the time.

 

[Box Ox]

Legally he would be a client if he just asked for advice. No need for a contract or fees to be paid to create a client situation. It was probably about the lawsuit Hannity was going through at the time.

Hannity and Fox News have their own legal teams for the routine stuff. No, he wanted this stuff on the DL.

 

[Box Ox]

The very same lawyer for drumpf and others that have had him sign NDA agreements. Yeah that's just a coincidence. Lol

And why the would any legitimate lawyer of many years only have 3 clients? This dude is a fixer disguised as a lawyer.

 

[MAKAVELI]

And why the would any legitimate lawyer of many years only have 3 clients? This dude is a fixer disguised as a lawyer.

He's as crooked as they come.

 

[moreluck]

Well, let's see if there was any provable illegal coordination that'd trigger the crime-fraud exception for Hannity also. Honestly don't really care what happens with that. But it's hilarious. Especially since Hannity has never disclosed his relationship with Cohen.

Do you go around telling others who your lawyer is??

 

[oldngray]

And why the would any legitimate lawyer of many years only have 3 clients? This dude is a fixer disguised as a lawyer.

Who said he only had 3 clients?