Again, you make a statement that hasnt been proven true, and run with it like it does. The actual story, backed up by witnesses says that this black man, attempted entry into an Irish pub. He was in line like everyone else. The crowd mostly white, and the establishment consists mostly of white patrons. The "bouncer" of the pub looked at his ID, and told him to "step aside" and refused him entry while taking all the other White patrons.
At that moment, an ABC officer came up from behind and pulled this man by his elbow backwards and took him out of line.
This officer helps to escalate the incident "according to witnesses" by grabbing this student and taking him to the ground when the student asks why he was DENIED entry.
There is an independent investigation ongoing to see whether or not this student was DENIED entry simply because he was black and the ABC officer went over and above reasonable actions in dealing with this situation.
The student while on the ground is clearly bleeding from his face when he calls out that he was denied entry because of Racism.
There is NO CONFIRMED proof that his ID was fake. That was simply the excuse made by the "bouncer".
Stay tuned.
TOS.
Which reason for his denial into the pub is more likely true, a 20 year old college kid with a fake I.D. OR, because he was black?
Also, why do you put the word bouncer in quotes? It's an actual job title. It would be like if someone called you a "truck driver", the quotes are 100% unnecessary