Eliminating the threat is rule 1 of self-defence.
This is the problem right? Who was acting in self-defence? It's possibly that both were.
Why even say that? Just take it like a man. Its a bad year for you leftists. Its ok.It's possibly that both were
You gunna feel real silly with your 3,000 dollar rifle when you get popped in the eye by my red rider.Not smart, on your part, but whatever.
You gunna feel real silly with your 3,000 dollar rifle when you get popped in the eye by my red rider.
Be careful with a “man of his intelligence”, but be gentle because he can’t even spell defense.
Yea, whatever you say. I guess I'll see ya when I see ya but you better hope you see me first.You gunna feel real silly with your 3,000 dollar rifle when you get popped in the eye by my red rider.
I find it strange and ironic that you would endorse and defend an administration who's politics would cheerfully prohibit you from owning or possessing the sort of weapon you seem to enjoy owning.I'm actually a FN-SCAR man. Pretty proficient with her to boot. The last thing these right-wing-nuts want to do is match wits and guns with me.
Just saying.
the evidence does not show he was trying to be famous but protecting his own ass from hardened criminals that liberals love to call protestors.I'm sure he's learned his lesson. I bet that jackass regrets "tryin to be famous bro" or whatever dumb he said.
does mommy know you're playing on her laptop. Karma came to the people he shot . the people of kenosha lost two felons and crippled a third.Karma never loses any cases. Rittenhouse should be more worried about that
did you watch the trial? the instructions were agreed to by both sides. the judge tried to give less instructions and the defense asked for more.Smh. Why do you all seem so surprised he got away with murder? Check my earlier posts I said he would be found not guilty. The way the judge set up the instructions I would've had to find him not guilty if I was a juror. This isn't the first or the last time justice fails in amerikkka
i think we'll find out they blew through the first three charges of first degree murder quickly and probably spent a lot of time on the last two lesser charges.I think it only took so long because some jurors were afraid of what might happen to them if they voted not guilty.
1st sentence answer:...in what way and in what time does the present administration prohibit the weapons I own? What proposed laws, rule or regulations have they enforced you disagree with. BE SPECIFIC.I find it strange and ironic that you would endorse and defend an administration who's politics would cheerfully prohibit you from owning or possessing the sort of weapon you seem to enjoy owning.
Am I misunderstanding you? Or do you believe that if such laws were to come to fruition, you'd be treated 'differently' than most other ordinary citizens?
Also, you've made it clear you very much disagree with how Rittenhouse defended himself against his attackers, and also your disappointment of the recent "not-guilty" verdict.
At the same time, (as indicated above) you have boasted, established an idle threat, and expressed enthusiasm at the prospect of using your semi-automatic weapon against people you've never met, and who have not threatened you, simply because of a political ideology that is not aligned with yours.
Explain yourself.
The group Rittenhouse represents (The Proud Boys) is far more of a domestic threat then BLM.
BLM didn't storm the capital and threaten to kill politicians because they didn't like the results of an election
Huh? Make some sense please!So they're only great at mass-murder when a crowd is involved? Well that's a relief.
Wow. I guess that liberalism you own has overcome any sense of objectivity and rational thought.The jury sent a message. Don't go anywhere without an AR15 or like kind, and when you kill someone just claim you were scared for your life because they might take your weapon away from you and shoot you with it. Shoot first established intent later.
Vigilante "justice" just got the green light. Now the arms race begins in earnest by the sides who wanted to believed that the law would protect them. Talk about a race to the bottom.
THAT is just more liberal emotional garbage. Try basing your opinions on fact and leave the emotion out of your decisions. THEN you will become a conservative thinker instead of a race baiting soap opera bag of media talking points.So a guy travels from out of town and goes looking for trouble with an automatic weapon and kills 2 people and maims one for life and he gets off?
Correct. Matching wits with you is unfair. You always arrive 1/2 prepared.I'm actually a FN-SCAR man. Pretty proficient with her to boot. The last thing these right-wing-nuts want to do is match wits and guns with me.
Just saying.
The media.Who was Kyle a threat to before he was attacked?