Rittenhouse Trial

[UnionStrong]

Lawyers have always been known as a slimy bunch.

Until you need one

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Here's a new phrase that the left is pushing.
The Rittenhouse Privilege

 

[rod]

Until you need one

Then you just hope yours is slimier that your opponents.

 

[Darmark7]

Brandon didn't see the trial either.

Would not of mattered. Brandon loves criminals. The smartest man he knows (his own judgement) is a crack head, incestuous pedophile. You call the smartest person you know a person you either want to be like or look up to.

 

[rod]

View attachment 360561

I don't know----that black dude looks pretty guilty .

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

I don't know----that black dude looks pretty guilty .

Well, from what I read about it, he was definitely guilty of selling drugs. I don't know why the hell the police didn't have bodycams, but they couldn't prove they announced themselves as cops before busting down his door.

Therefore, he had the right to self defense.

Funny, the media thinks the right to self defense is only for whites for some reason...

 

[BlackFriday]

Police in Portland were forced to declare a riot after protestors turned violent, clashing with officers and smashing windows as “looting” and protest erupted overnight in major cities following Kyle Rittenhouse acquittal.

Black Friday came early. Get a new bigger TV and a new pair of shoes to help ease the pain of the injustice.

100%. If looters voted they would all vote Democrat.

You accuse the left of being racists but you at the same time condemn them for their efforts to address what is without a question a degree of racial inequality in America. So just how has the left enslaved black Americans when you see how they have ascended to positions of high political office as well as great achievements in arts, science, academia that the opportunity to do so did not exist in prior generations?

DAMN you make this easy as usual.
The democrats started paying people welfare $. This robbed them of the character set they would have been able to develop had the recipients had to NOT rely on the government. Instead, the government (democrats), felt that these recipients, mainly black Americans, didn't have the ability to "make it" as millions of others have without gment assistance. This set off generations of kids watching their parents sit around waiting for the mailman to bring their $. These generations are products of the environment that democrats engineered. Just try to argue this your liberalness. Try to argue this while remembering 98% of black Americans vote Democrat. Unless trump is running of course.
Liberals are emotional "thinkers".

I just can not believe the nation is divided on this also.
EVERYTHING is political???

you just can not take the law in your own hands. there are exceptions but not in this case.

we are devolving in human development. the race to the bottom.

the lowest common denominator rules.

Thank obummer for 8 years of dividing America. Obummer the greatest division president ever.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

I just can not believe the nation is divided on this also.
EVERYTHING is political???

you just can not take the law in your own hands.

Ummm.......

I always carried a weapon when I went to the Bay area of California in feeders, especially in Oakland . Going to the airport there at night I did not stop at the red lights. Just slowed , looked both ways fast and kept it rolling.

have you ever been in Oakland at 3 o'clock in the morning? you don't stop for anything. I had a guy jump up on my step while almost at a stop at a light and told me to pull over. I pointed the gun at him and he jumped off.

glad they shot the mad dog down. I always carried a weapon in feeder. ( but no one knew until I retired )

I always carried protection even though it was against company policy. em ......

 

[UnionStrong]

Ummm.......

He’s got more stories than Disney

 

[vantexan]

I just can not believe the nation is divided on this also.
EVERYTHING is political???

you just can not take the law in your own hands. there are exceptions but not in this case.

we are devolving in human development. the race to the bottom.

the lowest common denominator rules.

No right to defend yourself? And what are citizens supposed to do when the state and local governments decide to let the riots happen? Do citizens have the right under those circumstances to guard their own businesses? Or must they let them be looted and burned because that's what the mob wants to do? There was a riot in Dallas too where a business owner who was apparently unarmed tried to stop the looting of his store. The mob dragged him into the street and beat him so severely he looked dead. More than a dozen guys beating and kicking him. Do you think that's ok? Over and over we saw Democratic run cities getting torched and looted. People assaulted and murdered. Very few charged with anything. Doesn't seem to faze liberals at all but let a guy defend his life with a gun and y'all are outraged. It has become survival of the fittest out there in these situations and average citizens have the right to defend their lives.

 

[UnionStrong]

No right to defend yourself? And what are citizens supposed to do when the state and local governments decide to let the riots happen? Do citizens have the right under those circumstances to guard their own businesses? Or must they let them be looted and burned because that's what the mob wants to do? There was a riot in Dallas too where a business owner who was apparently unarmed tried to stop the looting of his store. The mob dragged him into the street and beat him so severely he looked dead. More than a dozen guys beating and kicking him. Do you think that's ok? Over and over we saw Democratic run cities getting torched and looted. People assaulted and murdered. Very few charged with anything. Doesn't seem to faze liberals at all but let a guy defend his life with a gun and y'all are outraged. It has become survival of the fittest out there in these situations and average citizens have the right to defend their lives.

Attack me or my family and I will shoot you. Regardless of race, color or creed, I will shoot you. I believe in equality, not discrimination.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

That's the trouble when you take weapons from your home and parade them around town. Some people aren't going to see it as a deterrent but as a threat.
Welcome to high noon on Main St. 24/7/365

Apparently they didn't see it as much of a threat because they decided to attack him.

 

[zubenelgenubi]

They all wanted to get that rifle away from a trigger happy proud boy trying to take the law into his own hands

Keep up the defamation. People a collecting screen shots.

 

[vantexan]

Then why didn't he shoot Rittenhouse? You don't run up to somebody with both hands up to shoot them. Yes he was stupid chasing a trigger happy kid with a rifle but that doesn't mean he should be killed.

First off he pulled his pistol and Rittenhouse then trained his rifle on him. He acted like ok, sorry, don't shoot me. Rittenhouse started to lower his rifle then that guy swung up his pistol at Rittenhouse. Before he could shoot Rittenhouse blew off his bicep. Second in the heat of the moment you have no time to reason something out. Someone is coming at you with a weapon. That fellow would still have use of his arm if he had backed off like he initially indicated he would.

 

[Overpaid Union Thug]

A while back black rifle coffee company caught a lot of flack because Rittenhouse was seen wearing one of their T-shirts and they swiftly disavowed him. I think everyone should troll their social media sites. In addition to refusing to buy their products anymore.

It just doesn’t make sense for a supposed pro second amendment company, which markets itself by plastering AR15’s all over its products, to move so quickly to disavow a US citizen that used the very weapon they use for marketing to defend himself.

 

[wilberforce15]

 

[Babagounj]

Some just can't let this go.
News reports of possible civil trial.
I would caution the families thinking of this.
Everything about your relative will be on public display, you will not be able to continue to claim them as being victims.

 

[Overpaid Union Thug]

He was obviously never gonna shoot!!! Have you ever fired a weapon? Do you walk up to your target and shoot? If he wanted Rittenhouse dead he would of shot him.

Soo let me get this straight. You would have preferred Rittenhouse wait until he was rendered brain damaged or dead after being attacked with a skateboard, kicks/punches, possible gunshot wound? If he had and died, which is highly likely, would you be defending him as wholeheartedly as your are the lowlifes that attacked him? Probably not because you’re a leftist loon and could care less about whether or not he had the right to defend himself. It’s all about the BLM BS. Liberals have no morals or consistent principles. Your brains are dumpster fires at best.

 

[UnionStrong]

First off he pulled his pistol and Rittenhouse then trained his rifle on him. He acted like ok, sorry, don't shoot me. Rittenhouse started to lower his rifle then that guy swung up his pistol at Rittenhouse. Before he could shoot Rittenhouse blew off his bicep. Second in the heat of the moment you have no time to reason something out. Someone is coming at you with a weapon. That fellow would still have use of his arm if he had backed off like he initially indicated he would.

Left wing idiots are incapable of reasoning

 

[59 Dano]

The best move was when the prosecutor's star witness confirmed he had a gun in his hand when attacking the kid.

He even went so far as to admit that he pointed it at Rittenhouse.