Storming the Capitol
- Thread starter Operational needs
- Start date
1989
Well-Known Member
Not relevant. Just a distraction.
1989
Well-Known Member
Another distraction
newfie
Well-Known Member
love your tears
1989
Well-Known Member
No tears here, but if I were a liberal, I might have tears of joy. Republicans did it to themselves. It’s trumps fault for turning Republican Party into a trash party.
He told them to peacefully march. Did you want him to hold their hand too?
1989
Well-Known Member
He insights violence over and over but slips in one “peacefully” word to make it all better? Give me a break.
if anyone else did what he did, I would expect manslaughter charges.
He didn't "incite" anything. You'd have to condemn pretty much all politicians who've used similar rhetoric.
zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
You, and everybody who claims to believe Trump incited an insurrection, including the idiots in Congress, have less than no idea what you are talking about.
Free speech: what constitutes "incitement?"
What constitutes "incitement" under the First Amendment? When is speech so violent and dangerous that it can be prohibited by the government? In this special free speech series with the National ACLU, TalksOnLaw explores the limits of speech. Lee Rowland is the Policy Director at the New...
"The Supreme Court recognizes, rightfully, that political speech often involves really passionate, sometimes violent rhetoric. And unless and until it creates a specific and immediate roadmap to violence against others, it cannot be criminalized consistent with our First Amendment."
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
He doesn't believe anything he posts, he's trying to troll, he's just not very good at it.
newfie
Well-Known Member
I have no interest in the party . they have already violated their principles. I do enjoy your tears though . Trump owns you and your hatred for him forces you to post your nonsense here.
1989
Well-Known Member
So then we agree then.
BrownFlush
Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
fishtm2001
Banned
"The House Managers’ brief lays out the most important facts governing the Article of Impeachment. It documents how Trump undermined the 2020 election long before it took place; how he called his followers to Washington for a January 6 protest against Congress’s required approval of the electoral-vote total; how he and those working with him carefully goaded the volatile crowd into a violent assault on the Capitol; how, after learning that the mob was inside the Capitol, he tweeted a fresh attack on his own Vice-President, who was then in mortal danger; and how he refused to speak out to stop the violence or take the actions a commander-in-chief should take to protect the government from assault.You, and everybody who claims to believe Trump incited an insurrection, including the idiots in Congress, have less than no idea what you are talking about.
Free speech: what constitutes "incitement?"
What constitutes "incitement" under the First Amendment? When is speech so violent and dangerous that it can be prohibited by the government? In this special free speech series with the National ACLU, TalksOnLaw explores the limits of speech. Lee Rowland is the Policy Director at the New...www.talksonlaw.com
"The Supreme Court recognizes, rightfully, that political speech often involves really passionate, sometimes violent rhetoric. And unless and until it creates a specific and immediate roadmap to violence against others, it cannot be criminalized consistent with our First Amendment."
Those actions and inactions, the managers argue, violated the president’s oath of office and his duty to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed,” deliberately attacked the very foundation of the American republic, and recklessly imperiled national security."
Garrett Epps
fishtm2001
Banned
Let’s look at the parts of the transcript where Trump is supposedly not threatening Raffensperger. I’ve italicized the most relevant portions."
Tom Noah
Tom Noah
fishtm2001
Banned
"You don't concede when there's theft involved. Our country has had enough. We will not take it anymore."
"You will have an illegitimate president. That is what you will have, and we can't let that happen."
"if you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore."
"We're going to walk down to the Capitol and we're going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women, and we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them."
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
...we’re going to walk down to the Capitol and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women, and we’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong.
We have come to demand that Congress do the right thing and only count the electors who have been lawfully slated. Lawfully slated. I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.
Notice something here. One and only one law enforcement official claims that that the officer was not killed by blunt force trauma. Is this guy a medical professional and what is the official position being taken by the department?
Report: Blunt Force Trauma Did Not Kill Sicknick at Capitol Riot
We are now being told that Officer Brian Sicknick was not killed with a fire extinguisher during last month's Capitol Hill riot.www.breitbart.com
According to one law enforcement official, medical examiners did not find signs that the officer sustained any blunt force trauma, so investigators believe that early reports that he was fatally struck by a fire extinguisher are not true.
Similar threads
