AB831
Well-Known Member
“Unhappy about the election results and tried to overthrow the government to establish results they found more palatable” but why call it what it was when you can just repeat a Newsmax lie that no one with sense believes.
Stupid arguments about the Ground business model
- Thread starter It will be fine
- Start date
AB831
Well-Known Member
And?
Sorry, don't watch Newsmax. You have a rich fantasy life going there if you think a few hundred unarmed people had any chance of taking over the United States.
Just saying. You seem to know what Newsmax is saying so you must be a Trump supporter too! Good on ya mate!
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Nice try leftie.
You deflected from the hundreds of violent riots with whataboutism by bringing up the riot at the capitol. Then you said whataboutism is for simpletons.
Funny stuff lol.
AB831
Well-Known Member
Their failure to accomplish their goal doesn’t mean their goal wasn’t what it was. Not sure why that’s so hard to understand for you.
I see that you're still unable to provide any "alternative facts" that would produce an alternative reason for the attack on the Capital other than the ones law enforcement is using to charge nearly 400 people with serious federal crimes.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
But you will still gladly accept your benefits from whichever " socialized government program " (lol) you can qualify for while the ones you can't qualify for are "socialism"
What amuses me about you people on the right is that you went on a fear of socialism tear because it was instilled in you people by right wing media and right wing bible thumpers . But when it was pointed out to you the fact that many of you including loved ones are getting by on those very programs you tried splitting hairs and covering your tracks by separating the two . The programs that many on the right were literally surviving on were placed into the "socialized government programs" column which granted them benevolence and exemption while all the others especially those which benefit a smaller and less politically powerful demographic were cast into the "evil socialism" column.
Since you're using MLK's comment to justify the Capital riot then those very same comments justifies last summer's city riots.
Thank you for bringing closure to this matter.
AB831
Well-Known Member
Lmao, awwwww you conspiracy theorists aren’t having your lies validated? Poor little snowflake
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
You seem to struggle with common sense. Let me help you out little lady.
I'm pointing out how stupid the long standing leftist narrative supporting riots is.
Thanks for outing yourself as someone who falls for that crap though. "Language of the unheard"! LMFAO!
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Does that make sense in your head kiddo?
I didn't mention any conspiracy theories.
Hurr durr conspiracy, insurrection, Qanon, racism!!!!!! Lol.
Talking about trying to deflect. When asked to disclose the reasons and objectives behind the Capital riots you tossed out MLK's comments without first considering the fact that his comments apply to all riots regardless of reason or objective. Falling into crap? You fell into your own .
Fred's Myth
Nonhyphenated American
You deflect from the question of whether you believe that the fiscally irresponsible socialized programs you support were ill-conceived or not.
And I noticed you ignored the revelation that you are fine with taking wealth from those who earned it to feather your own nest.
Social security is in dire straits because too much income of the top 10% of earners is excluded from taxes. Simple. If ALL income was subject to the same rate poor working people pay, the program would be fully funded.
Ill conceived or not is a matter of opinion. What they did do however is that they prevailed over all constitutional challenges which supersedes all laymen's opinions including both yours and mine.
When did I ever say anything about taking wealth from those who earned it? Then again speaking about wealth EARNED shouldn't Paris Hilton's trust fund be required to help pay the cost of keeping up the roads for the limousine her fat ass is being hauled around in? Shouldn't the Koch Brothers inherited billions that was earned by their father courtesy of the refineries he built for Stalin be used to help maintain the runways their private jets land on?
Shouldn't Joel Osteen's so called "nonprofit corporation" be required to pay to help maintain safe and navigable waterways for him to sail the "nonprofit's" 40 million dollar yacht on?
Like Jesus said- kill those you don't like. 'Thou shalt not kill' is pretty randomly enforced by so=called christians.
And everyone on the right is a violent anti-government traitor, just like every BLM member is violent. You want to lump all those on the left as a single entity, but when the right wing nuts literally try to stop the seating of the president, it was just a few, and maybe Antifa and BLM were really behind it.
And those PUBLICLY funded socialist roads made her wealth possible. Those who benefit the most should pay the most.
