Sportello
Well-Known Member
Do I work for you?That's the tagline of The X-Files, a science fiction TV series that was very popular during the 90s. Not an actual answer.
Why can't you just tell me what the evidence is?
Do I work for you?That's the tagline of The X-Files, a science fiction TV series that was very popular during the 90s. Not an actual answer.
Why can't you just tell me what the evidence is?
simply stating or suggesting that there were other crimes isn't evidence of them.
I'm asking leftists what the evidence of other crimes if because I feel like I'll have to vote for Trump if no such evidence is produced. And I don't want to do that. So maybe I'm actually begging for evidence of other crimes.
I’m sure that if you really wanted to look, you could find it. The truth is out there.
The jury agreed. Even the one that got their news from social.
Try using the Google. I’m sure someone could explain it to you. Maybe try Reddit in the. R/explain it like I’m five. Maybe when Dido comes back from his unplanned vacation he can explain it to you.
That's the tagline of The X-Files, a science fiction TV series that was very popular during the 90s. Not an actual answer.
Why can't you just tell me what the evidence is?
Do I work for you?
Coward’s answer.Do I work for you?
Because you won’t necessarily accept the answers that I provide.This is a place for discussion, sir. You're here. I'm here. Why have me search Google and Reddit for the answer to my question if you already know what the answer is? Feel free to tell me what the evidence is any time.
Are you attacking me?Coward’s answer.
I'm asking leftists what the evidence of other crimes is because I feel like I'll have to vote for Trump if no such evidence is produced. And I don't want to do that. So maybe I'm actually begging for evidence of other crimes.
you won’t necessarily accept the answers that I provide.
Does the shoe fit?Are you attacking me?
MSNBC doesn't count. Name the evidence and the crime that got him convicted.Because you won’t necessarily accept the answers that I provide.
This question has been asked and answered hundreds of times by news and legal experts.
Read the jury instructions, read the testimony. Read the charges.
Surely you are capable of that?
Meanwhile your buddy DIDO won’t respond to his lies about voting laws, yet I’m supposed to be your home school teacher?
Yes, you are free from thinking.Im an independent voter. Free thinker. I don't watch the lame stream media. Fake news. I wasn't going to vote for Trump but now that I know he's a criminal I am voting for him twice. Maga.
Try me. I want there to be evidence. What is it?
Now you are 'actually' asking a different question than what I answered.Now do one for:
“What evidence elevated Trump falsified business records charges from misdemeanors to felonies that could be tried in 2024?”
Then you’ll be answering what I’ve actually been asking.
Falsification of business records isn't a felony in New York if it wasn't done in furtherance of another crime. And the statute of limitations had expired for charges of misdemeanor falsification of business records.
So what's the evidence of the other crime that elevated the charges to felonies? Focus for me here.
Now do one for:
“What evidence elevated Trump falsified business records charges from misdemeanors to felonies that could be tried in 2024?”
Then you’ll be answering what I’ve actually been asking.
Now you are 'actually' asking a different question than what I answered.
Are you asking about the statute of limitations? If so, just say it.
To fight what? They all should've evaded and told Congress to fight their own war.Bone spurs over here evaded the military draft while his peers went off to fight.
Yes, I must have.I am indeed. Because the question you tried to answer today is not the one I've been asking for 24 hours now.
I've been saying it since yesterday. Did you miss my posts from yesterday?
Yes, I must have.
Did you miss my answer?
I'm sure all of that will be litigated by people more knowledgeable than me or you.
One argument that I'm aware of is that the statute of limitations can be tolled, since a sitting president can not be indicted.
You will be waiting a long time, he hasn’t posted anything useful here that I know of.I didn't miss your acknowledgement of my actual question which didn't provide the evidence I was asking for in my actual question. Which is why I'm wondering why you're instead providing answers to a question I didn't ask.
Let me know if you've got something.