It is the "plan" that is misleading to me. It provides some sort of false hope for the future, at least to my eyes.
False hope is precisely what it is.
The best way of evaulating a retirement plan is to see who is placing money aside for an employee's retirement. In general, it takes about 15% of an employees annual gross to properly fund a retirement. Whether that comes from a DBPP or IRA or you name it, it takes about 15%.
FedEx is taking the approach that employees have to take an increased share of the burden to fully fund their personal retirement.
I'm sure all employees remember last February or so when their senior manager gave the pony show about the pension plans being changed. They were instructed to tell their employees to fully fund their 401(k)s to ensure maximum matching funds.
The PPP provides 5% of gross. The 401(k) will provide with full contribution about 8% of annual gross (employee deduction plus matching). This leaves a short fall of about 2% of gross. The important thing to remember is that under the traditional pension plan, the employer provided the actuarial 15% of an employee's annual gross, providing a FULL pension without employee contribution. With the PPP and 401(k), FedEx's contribution towards the necessary funding for a pension was cut in
half. The extra percentage point or two late in a career is a drop in the bucket (for the sake of our resident shill).
To make matters worse, the 401(k) matching funds were suspended this year. No statement has been issued regarding any sort of "catch-up" of these missing funds.
Further compounding the issue is the pay freeze this year. For a mid-range full time Courier, this resulted in about a $2,250 shortfall in income this year (half that amount for a part-timer). This loss isn't confined to just this year, it will be compounded for every year the employee works. An employee that is making $38.000 (and should've made $40,250) will have that $2,250 missing from every year they work. For 2010, their payraise will be based on the $38,000, not the $40,250. They should be at $42,500 for 2010, not the 2% added to $38,000 ($38,760).
So with the 2009 pay freeze and the 2010 2%, a mid-range full time Courier will only make $38,760 in 2010 instead of the $42,500 (shortfall of $3,740). If the full payraise rates are restored in 2011 (don't hold your breath), the pay will be $41,085 instead of $45,000 if no pay freeze had been enacted for 2009 and only a 2% raise for 2010. I could continue the progression indefinately, but the point is that every full-time Courier is going to be shortchanged $2,250 this year, and close to $4,000 for each year after 2009. This can never be made up. This just adds insult to the injury of the Traditional Pension being pulled.
If one adds up the percentages in lost compensation (7.5% retirement and close to 8% in wages after this year), FedEx handed every employee a 15% reduction in their total compensation package. The amazing thing is that a majority of employees are still smiling and consuming all the KoolAid they can consume.
The shills can equivocate as much as they like, but they can't deny this fact: UPS is operating in the same environment as FedEx. I don't see any of their drivers taking a 15% reduction in their compensation levels this year - and every year here after. If FedEx had a union, NONE of this would be taking place. So if a FedEx employee asks how much are they losing for not being unionized, you can state about $4,000/yr for a full time employee and half that for a part-timer. This figure is only for what we have lost, NOT the differential in pay between FedEx and UPS. If you add that into the mix, it all goes up from there.
I know that I can't partake of the KoolAid when I know it would be costing me $4-7,000 a year as a full time employee.
For the sake of the shills.... 25,000 FTE Couriers times $7,000 = $175 million.
A drop in the bucket for FedEx with revenues approaching $20 Billion this year (about 1% of gross FedEx revenue).