The Russians Are Coming, The Russians Are Coming!

[El Correcto]

Yeah. The Republicans just won’t let the investigation continue in peace. Stays in the news!

“WHERE’S THE EVIDENCE (from this ongoing investigation)? SHUT IT DOWN! SHUT IT DOWWWWWNNNNN! WITCH HUNNNNT! HILLARRRRYYYYYYY!”

What

 

[Box Ox]

What

You asked why everyone was still talking about Russia. The Republicans won’t just let the investigation move forward in peace for some reason. It’s all over the news. So it’s still relevant.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

That doesn’t make sense.

Andrew Johnson did it in 1866 so this one is not up for ignorance jumpin' into the fray.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Who knew the “conservatives” are the ones supporting the idea that the chief executive can act like a king above the law? Not exactly the founder’s vision.

I agree with that opinion but opinion has no bearing on legal matters.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

None of that statement is true.

Hopefully you are not surprised.
I assume everything posted in Current Events is made up based on Confirmation Bias.

The level of delusional assertions in Current Events is funny as hell.
I just laugh at all the goobers myself ... just like I did with Obama.

This is fun but nothing to even remotely consider as truth.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Y’all still going on about Russia? Jesus.

It's the nightly humor hour.

 

[Sportello]

Andrew Johnson did it in 1865 so this one is not up for ignorance jumpin' into the fray.

Are you sure? Johnson didn’t pardon anyone in 1865.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Are you sure? Johnson didn’t pardon anyone in 1865.

Off 1 year 1866.
Thanks, I changed it.

 

[Box Ox]

Andrew Johnson did it in 1866 so this one is not up for ignorance jumpin' into the fray.

Was that really comparable in a way that could be considered precedent setting for this case, though? Johnson issued nearly 13,000 pardons to higher level Confederates not included under the policy of general amnesty that included 14 ineligible groups based upon specific involvement in the war, and required recitation of the following oath:

“I, _____, do solemnly swear or affirm, in presence of Almighty God, that I will henceforth faithfully support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Union of the States thereunder. And that I will, in like manner, abide by and faithfully support all laws and proclamations which have been made during the existing rebellion with reference to the emancipation of slaves, so help me God.”

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

The level of delusional assertions in Current Events is funny as hell.
I just laugh at all the goobers including myself.

Fixed

 

[It will be fine]

I agree with that opinion but opinion has no bearing on legal matters.

It does with progressive judges. Judges can certainly weigh the intent of a law when making a decision. I think the founder’s intent of avoiding a tyrant is pretty clear.

 

[Turdferguson]

Off 1 year 1866.
Thanks, I changed it.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Was that really comparable in a way that could be considered precedent setting for this case, though?

yes

 

[Old Man Jingles]

View attachment 197349

Must be ... you're posting!

 

[Old Man Jingles]

It does with progressive judges.

By progressive judges, you mean judges that make new laws?
You might have a point there.

 

[Turdferguson]

Must be ... you're posting!

Just to keep you in line. Counter act your bull with my stronger bull

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Just to keep you in line. Counter act your bull with my stronger bull

I prefer to think of it as Goober Pooh!

 

[El Correcto]

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/266038556504494082

 

[vantexan]

I prefer to think of it as Goober Pooh!

Or Gomer's pile.