I don’t think so. Because if the charge is money laundering, that goes straight to the top the guy who can’t pardon himself.Just floating that possibility limits Mueeler's ability to intimidate witnesses/suspects.
I don’t think so. Because if the charge is money laundering, that goes straight to the top the guy who can’t pardon himself.Just floating that possibility limits Mueeler's ability to intimidate witnesses/suspects.
Which Constitutional lawyers and scholars said that?I wasn't aware Trump had said that.
I was going by what I have heard Constitutional lawyers and scholars say.
The only reason a POTUS "couldn't" is due to political reasons ... not legal reasons.
I don’t think so. Because if the charge is money laundering, that goes straight to the top the guy who can’t pardon himself.
You are dumberAnd you snowflakes don't believe anything that falls out of that fat mouth of his.
I can't decide which one is dumber!
.
.
Why do you keep hanging on to this falsehood.I don’t think so. Because if the charge is money laundering, that goes straight to the top the guy who can’t pardon himself.
Than who/what?You are dumber
That would surely end up in the SCOTUS.I wasn't aware Trump had said that.
I was going by what I have heard Constitutional lawyers and scholars say.
The only reason a POTUS "couldn't" is due to political reasons ... not legal reasons.
Even The NY Times says the President can pardon himself with the one "big" exception and that exception is impeachment.
So you are suggesting pardoning a defendant before a trial?Why do you keep hanging on to this falsehood.
The POTUS can pardon/commute anyone including the POTUS except for impeachment.
It's in the Constitution.
Even The NY Times says the President can pardon himself with the one "big" exception and that exception is impeachment.
Can Trump Pardon Himself? Not if He's Impeached
I agree that is the thought and some call it a rule.That would surely end up in the SCOTUS.
There is the ‘can’t be a judge in your own trial’ thought, and that American ideal of no man is above the law.
So you are suggesting pardoning a defendant before a trial?
That doesn’t make sense.That is possible, yes.
Who knew the “conservatives” are the ones supporting the idea that the chief executive can act like a king above the law? Not exactly the founder’s vision.That is possible, yes.
I’m not surprised.Who knew the “conservatives” are the ones supporting the idea that the chief executive can act like a king above the law? Not exactly the founder’s vision.
None of that statement is true.Who knew the “conservatives” are the ones supporting the idea that the chief executive can act like a king above the law? Not exactly the founder’s vision.
Y’all still going on about Russia? Jesus.