THE TRUMP 2024 THREAD

[fishtm2001]

Please refer to post #7,063 for the CNN-provided details of the bill.

donald denounced a bill that he had not seen and his lapdogs are making fellow republicans' heads spin

 

[Box Ox]

donald denounced a bill that he had not seen and his lapdogs are making fellow republicans' heads spin

I doubt Trump reads much. But the details of the bill are the details. Biden has mentioned them himself.

 

[Next Day Err]

donald denounced a bill that he had not seen and his lapdogs are making fellow republicans' heads spin

Because it's such a crisis for our country it'd be better to wait and roll the dice on Trump being elected along with enough Republicans in both chambers to really fix our immigration and border problem. So let's allow the problem to fester for at least another year.

lol.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

In early 2018 a unified Republican government was all for offering a path to citizenship for "the Dreamers". The only question was how?

The offer was a path to citizenship for the daca aliens in exchange for money to build a wall.

And Democrats rejected the offer.

Because the most important thing for Democrats is to keep the flow of illegals going.

 

[Brown Down]

Bah bah is all I keep hearing

 

[sailfish]

Trump’s $50 Million Mystery Debt Looks Like ‘Tax Evasion’

Donald Trump has long claimed he personally owed tens of millions to an obscure entity related to his Chicago tower. But court docs claim Trump Org. now says it never existed.

www.thedailybeast.com

Maybe you should evade taxes too.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Because it's such a crisis for our country it'd be better to wait and roll the dice on Trump being elected along with enough Republicans in both chambers to really fix our immigration and border problem. So let's allow the problem to fester for at least another year.

lol.

The fix you want is to important millions of low wage workers.

 

[fishtm2001]

The offer was a path to citizenship for the daca aliens in exchange for money to build a wall.

And Democrats rejected the offer.

Because the most important thing for Democrats is to keep the flow of illegals going.

“I've always [been] kind of worried about that, that [Trump] was going to give the Democrats far more than really was warranted in exchange for the wall. Because more border barriers, like I said, they're important. But there are other things that are more important, things like plugging loopholes in our asylum laws, E-Verify and what have you.”

In other words, The Wall is a totem of Trumpism"



Mark Krikorian

 

[fishtm2001]

The offer was a path to citizenship for the daca aliens in exchange for money to build a wall.

And Democrats rejected the offer.

Because the most important thing for Democrats is to keep the flow of illegals going.

money for a wall that Tubby said Mexico would pay for?

 

[sailfish]

Admit it, you love the libs and centrists here. Keeps it from being too much of an echo chamber

Centrists. Lol.

 

[fishtm2001]

The fix you want is to important millions of low wage workers.

that would be the wish of corporate America, a staunch ally of the gop

 

[Next Day Err]

that would be the wish of corporate America, a staunch ally of the gop

Yep.

See: The DeSantis experiment in Florida. The ownership class panicked and twisted his arm to get the migrant flow going again.

 

[fishtm2001]

"...it would toughen the standard to qualify for asylum and provide massive new resources for border cops and for processing asylum-seekers faster, including speeding the removal of those who don’t qualify. It would give presidents an entirely new authority to shut down asylum-seeking when border encounters hit certain thresholds.

These aren’t simply Republican-friendly proposals. Lankford pointed out that many of those are resources and authorities that Trump himself urged Congress to give him as president. If Trump gets elected again, Lankford said, he would enjoy authorities that “he’d actually asked for.”


Senator James Lankford

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

money for a wall that Tubby said Mexico would pay for?

Yes Democrats refused to get a path to citizenship for daca aliens because they want to keep the border open.

Thank you for not denying it.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

“I've always [been] kind of worried about that, that [Trump] was going to give the Democrats far more than really was warranted in exchange for the wall. Because more border barriers, like I said, they're important. But there are other things that are more important, things like plugging loopholes in our asylum laws, E-Verify and what have you.”

In other words, The Wall is a totem of Trumpism"



Mark Krikorian

The offer was a path to citizenship for the daca aliens in exchange for money to build a wall.

And Democrats rejected the offer.

Because the most important thing for Democrats is to keep the flow of illegals going.

 

[Box Ox]

The fix you want is to important millions of low wage workers.

that would be the wish of corporate America, a staunch ally of the gop

Opinion | How corporate liberalism is changing both parties - The Washington Post

September 3, 2023

"It’s not your imagination: Business, especially big business, is more liberal than it used to be, and Democrats are now more comfortable than Republicans with corporate engagement in politics. That’s the takeaway from an academic survey of business leaders and the public described in a pair of papers published last month. “The decoupling of business from the Republican coalition,” write researchers Eitan Hersh of Tufts University and Sarang Shah of the University of California at Berkeley, “represents one of the most significant changes in American politics in decades.”

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

that would be the wish of corporate America, a staunch ally of the gop

Corporate America is aligned with the Democrat party.

 

[Next Day Err]

Corporate America is aligned with the Democrat party.

Which companies are you ready to boycott?

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Which companies are you ready to boycott?

Deflection.

 

[Next Day Err]

Deflection.

You’re still supporting all these Democrat-loving corporations?!