Could you point to what proof she had that convinced the jury?
Lets see. She claimed she was raped in the changing room of a busy store. No one heard screams or thrashing about. She didn't report it to the store or police. She didn't go to the hospital and have a rape kit done. No reporting it to the newspapers that a prominent New York businessman had raped her. She did an interview with a magazine in 2019, which one was it, "Vanity Fair?" Can't remember. Cover photo showed her in a Donna Karan outfit she claimed was the one she was wearing in 1994 when she was raped. Only Donna Karan didn't make that outfit in 1994 so when that was pointed out she suddenly couldn't remember what year it was.
So can you tell me what proof she had that would make a jury award her $88 million in two separate verdicts? Can you tell what was so wrong about what Trump said about the first verdict that supposedly defamed her to the tune of $83 million?
When are you going to realize that they held this trial in a district that is overwhelmingly liberal and anti Trump? It wasn't about anything he did. It was about getting him in any way possible.
Meanwhile Joe Biden sexually penetrated Tara Reade in 1993 according to her. She did tell friends and family. Her mother called the Larry King show about it at the time. She wasn't some partisan trying to destroy Biden. She was a young Biden campaign staffer. She's totally ignored by the DNC. Where are all the liberal feminists championing her cause?
