I think it’s pretty fair to say those are the things that Supreme Court is going to argue. You asked for opinions and you were looking for a fight lol kind of silly I also my hope Hometown baseball team wins the World Series but I know they won’t and I can give you the reasons and it’s not an argument for why they won’t. It’s my opinion prove me wrong, but I doubt it.
Come to think of it you asked for everyone else’s opinion and then you don’t give your own. Why don’t you put your foot out there and give yours? I won’t be disappointed in your opinion.
I’ve given my opinion several times, is it really not clear? And yes, I asked for everyone’s opinion, not on what you think the surpreme court is going to do, although that is fair to say also
You should probably listen to some of the oral arguments from today. Your Richard Nixon example is not going well.
Who, if anyone, should have qualified immunity, per you?
That's a serious stretch. Presidents need immunity from vindictive political opponents. Doesn't matter which party you're in. There can be brakes on presidential power without completely stripping all protections.
Nobody should be above the law
But whether they actually broke a law is an entirely different matter.
Should corporations have immunity from rival corporations suing?
should presidents not be able to be impeached either to prevent politcial rivals from impeaching and removing them?
Apples and oranges.
If there's proof that a president committed a serious crime then have at it. But, as in the case of the last two impeachments, abusing the impeachment process by using hearsay witnesses, etc in hopes of hanging something on the president not only cheapens the process but threatens national unity.
Most of what is hurled at Trump is a made up narrative in hopes of removing him. Be careful what you wish for if you manage to make that happen. Literally every time a party holds both houses they may go after the president who isn't in the same party.
i guess just agree to disagree then. Whether it’s a democrat or a Republican, if you’re going to be president, and hold that much responsibility, I think you should be held to a higher standard, and not a lower
You're under the impression that most Republicans are against Trump? And presidential immunity doesn't mean the president can just run over the Constitution. Can't just take away everyone's rights. And again, whether a law was broken has yet to be determined. Democrats want the court to rubber stamp their opinions.
why not? What would be stopping him? The law? Presidential immunity. Can’t let the law stop him, otherwise every president would be held up by political rivals, remember?
