THE TRUMP 2024 THREAD

El Correcto

god is dead
The Supreme Court's Obergefell ruling legalized it nationwide.



You want the trans insanity stuff codified so men and boys can enter women's accommodations and private spaces as they please. That's your thing but lack of it not denying homosexual
How about equal federal civil rights for lgbtq people?

Apparently an Ally of lgbt rights who wants to defend them: Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeee


Okay bud keep coping with your new found bigotry and trying to rationalize it.
 

El Correcto

god is dead
District judges don't have the power to control executive branch policy which is what activist leftist judges are trying to do. The wife of the judge who just issued the order on deportation contributed $10,000 to the Biden/Harris campaign. If you think it's not their intent to stop Trump in any manner possible then I still have the Brooklyn Bridge available for purchase.
“In 2002, President George W. Bush nominated Boasberg as an associate judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. In 2011, President Barack Obama selected him to be a judge on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, and he was confirmed by the Senate in a 96-0 vote.”

Bipartisan as bipartisan gets in this country.
Voted in with no objections, appointed by a republican, elevated by a democrat.

The man is just doing his job.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
The Supreme Court's Obergefell ruling legalized it nationwide.



You want the trans insanity stuff codified so men and boys can enter women's and girl's accommodations and private spaces as they please. That's your thing but lack of it is not denying homosexual rights.
How about equal federal civil rights for lgbtq people?

Apparently an Ally of lgbt rights who wants to defend them: Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeee


Okay bud keep coping with your new found bigotry and trying to rationalize it.

Reasonable people shouldn't be fooled when leftists conflate the two and attempt to defend an insane thing by putting a sane thing in front of it.

There you go again. Hiding the insane thing behind the sane thing and pretending I'm the problem if I don't defend both homosexuality and trans insanity.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
“In 2002, President George W. Bush nominated Boasberg as an associate judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. In 2011, President Barack Obama selected him to be a judge on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, and he was confirmed by the Senate in a 96-0 vote.”

Bipartisan as bipartisan gets in this country.
Voted in with no objections, appointed by a republican, elevated by a democrat.

The man is just doing his job.
I do my job every day too, and sometimes I get written up and disciplined as well. Sometimes I even deserve it.
 

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member
Homosexuality is probably as old as mankind. Transgenders are mentally ill. Period.
No.

Transgender people have existed throughout human history, across various cultures and civilizations. While the modern term "transgender" is relatively new (coined in the mid-20th century), historical records and cultural traditions show that gender diversity has been recognized for millennia.

Ancient and Historical Examples:

  • Ancient Mesopotamia & Sumer (c. 3000 BCE–500 BCE): The Gala priests of the Sumerian goddess Inanna were assigned male at birth but lived as women and performed religious roles.
  • Ancient Egypt (c. 1500 BCE): Some tomb inscriptions and depictions suggest the existence of gender-nonconforming individuals, though interpretations vary.
  • Ancient India (c. 500 BCE–present): The Hijras, a third-gender group, have been mentioned in Hindu texts like the Ramayana and Mahabharata and were historically respected in South Asian society.
  • Ancient Greece & Rome (c. 500 BCE–500 CE): The Galli, priests of the goddess Cybele, were often castrated and lived as women.
  • Pre-Colonial North America: Many Indigenous tribes recognized Two-Spirit people, who fulfilled roles outside the male-female binary.
  • Medieval & Renaissance Europe: Cases exist of individuals living as a gender different from their birth assignment, including people assigned female at birth who lived as men to access social and economic opportunities.

Modern Recognition:

  • In the 19th and early 20th centuries, medical and psychological studies began documenting transgender identities.
  • By the mid-20th century, individuals such as Christine Jorgensen (1952) and Laverne Cox (21st century) brought transgender issues into public consciousness.
Transgender identities are not new; they have been part of human history for thousands of years, often respected in many societies before colonial or religious influences imposed rigid gender binaries.

Took me all of 15 seconds to gather this information.
 

El Correcto

god is dead
I do my job every day too, and sometimes I get written up and disciplined as well. Sometimes I even deserve it.
This guy hasn’t been proven to have done anything immoral and is executing his judicial duties of oversight on the executive.
There are processes in place for reviewing the judges work. The Trump admin is trying to circumvent that by having a bipartisan nominee impeached.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
There you go again. Hiding the insane thing behind the sane thing and pretending I'm the problem if I don't defend both homosexuality and trans insanity.
Yeah you aren’t an ally of lgbt rights.
I don’t know why you spoke up like you were.

It's OK if you personally require one to buy into the T part of LGBT. Being completely fine with 3 out of 4 works fine for me. Used to be good enough for me to work for Democratic candidates. I haven't changed. The left has.
 

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member
This guy hasn’t been proven to have done anything immoral and is executing his judicial duties of oversight on the executive.
There are processes in place for reviewing the judges work. The Trump admin is trying to circumvent that by having a bipartisan nominee impeached.
Bottom line? MAGA and this White House wants a dictatorship. Chief Justice Roberts wants to matter so he's doing his job to make it clear that Article 2 has to listen to Article 3.

Say it with me now, guys:

CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
 

El Correcto

god is dead
It's OK if you personally require one to buy into the T part of LGBT. Being completely fine with 3 out of 4 works fine for me. Used to be good enough for me to work for Democratic candidates. I haven't changed. The left has.
Yeah you’ve become a real jerk.
Should probably quit getting your opinions and facts on lgbt issues from a right wing orthodox Jewish real estate agent on TikTok.
 

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member
It's OK if you personally require one to buy into the T part of LGBT. Being completely fine with 3 out of 4 works fine for me. Used to be good enough for me to work for Democratic candidates. I haven't changed. The left has.
The left is trying to expand rights to people. It's not always easy and the right usually freaks out and drags the fight down into the mud but that's what it is. Some are just uncomfortable with people that are different from them.
 

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
It's OK if you personally require one to buy into the T part of LGBT. Being completely fine with 3 out of 4 works fine for me. Used to be good enough for me to work for Democratic candidates. I haven't changed. The left has.
It’s a sad state of affairs. I feel your pain. WTF are they thinking?
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
This guy hasn’t been proven to have done anything immoral and is executing his judicial duties of oversight on the executive.
There are processes in place for reviewing the judges work. The Trump admin is trying to circumvent that by having a bipartisan nominee impeached.
Nothing wrong with trying to impeach if they feel it’s deserved if it’s not, he won’t be it’s simple as that. Trump won’t have the final say.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
It's OK if you personally require one to buy into the T part of LGBT. Being completely fine with 3 out of 4 works fine for me. Used to be good enough for me to work for Democratic candidates. I haven't changed. The left has.
Yeah you’ve become a real jerk.
Should probably quit getting your opinions and facts on lgbt issues from a right wing orthodox Jewish real estate agent on TikTok.

I can assure you that my views on homosexuality and gay rights aren't in the same universe as Ben Shapiro, etc.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Bottom line? MAGA and this White House wants a dictatorship. Chief Justice Roberts wants to matter so he's doing his job to make it clear that Article 2 has to listen to Article 3.

Say it with me now, guys:

CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
CO-EQUAL BRANCHES OF
You can say it as many times as you want, but it’s just not actually true. They all have a role, but they are not equal. Never have been.
 
Top