trump 2016

Indecisi0n

Well-Known Member
So first Trump says the election is "rigged" and for a while questioned whether he would even accept the results.

Now that Wisconsin is going to get a recount he says that action is a scam and that the election process needed to be respected. Lol. Guess this is the hypocrisy we have to look forward to for the next 4 years.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Trump, who once said “I could be the first presidential candidate to run and make money on it,” has attracted criticism for mixing business and politics to an unprecedented degree.

no he has not received criticism. He has received attacks by an extremely biased left wing media trying to create something where nothing exists.
 

wayfair

swollen member
Now that Wisconsin is going to get a recount he says that action is a scam and that the election process needed to be respected. Lol. Guess this is the hypocrisy we have to look forward to for the next 4 years.

We need a distraction so no one sees what's going on at Standing Rock...
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
So your "theory" is that Donald would reject the 747 currently provided as AF1 and downsize to a 757? That's a fantasy at best.
Actually the 757 is now in demand by the airlines .
The production of the 757 was short and Boeing never made an another craft to really replace it .
They did revamp the 737 but it still falls short of the 757 in overall functions.
The 757 can climb to cruising altitude quickly while the 737 has to slowly climb to one height , burn off some fuel then climb up to another height , repeating this until reaching cruising height.
So having a 757 as AF-1 , might encourage Boeing to bring back the 757 .
 
P

pickup

Guest
Can you cite evidence that millions of people voted illegally like DJ claimed?

No but I can cite evidence that the legal electoral votes are determined to some degree by the illegal population residing in the United States.

The electoral votes each state wields is based on the population counts of each state. The population count is determined by the census. The census counts everyone regardless of legal status. The higher the number of illegals in a state such as California the higher it's electoral votes.

So a state such as California would have less electoral votes if immigration laws were enforced.


True Story!
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
No but I can cite evidence that the legal electoral votes are determined to some degree by the illegal population residing in the United States.

The electoral votes each state wields is based on the population counts of each state. The population count is determined by the census. The census counts everyone regardless of legal status. The higher the number of illegals in a state such as California the higher it's electoral votes.

So a state such as California would have less electoral votes if immigration laws were enforced.


True Story!
Sounds like an argument against the electoral college.
 

MAKAVELI

Banned
No but I can cite evidence that the legal electoral votes are determined to some degree by the illegal population residing in the United States.

The electoral votes each state wields is based on the population counts of each state. The population count is determined by the census. The census counts everyone regardless of legal status. The higher the number of illegals in a state such as California the higher it's electoral votes.

So a state such as California would have less electoral votes if immigration laws were enforced.


True Story!
Plenty of undocumented in red states as well. So your theory that California has has an unfair advantage of representation in the electoral college is disambiguous at best.
 
Top