Indecisi0n
Well-Known Member
Only if you promise to undress slowly, very slowly.Yes, as long as we get to dress up too.
Only if you promise to undress slowly, very slowly.Yes, as long as we get to dress up too.
What you may or may not know is, @scooby0048 was in law enforcement before he came to UPS. His investigative training was most certainly more intensive and to the point than anything an OCS or higher would have to go through.
Love it, Scoob.
Next chick I get pregnant I'm going to use UPS phycology and blame her.
What could you have done to avoid this?
After peak. Who's going to do that route?Fired
I was not aware of that. Now I am.
Did you think to put a d-note on her drivers side window letting her know that you were parked behind her?
So Anal Cover, you are already predicting gloom and doom for those that may work 70 hours in a week. I am sure we said disregard all the training we gave you and drive like you stole it to get everything delivered. Please stop with and drive like the professional you claim to be.
Did you read the article, the police gave the driver a ticket - 'NOT UPS MANAGEMENT" - the driver did something stupid and caused an accident..not orion, not ORS..THE DRIVER DID! DEAL WITH IT!
I already gave you a pass, now you're being cocky. ---Reported
What ever casual they hire in JanuaryAfter peak. Who's going to do that route?
But they often omit pertinent facts. Like management instructing driver to deliver in EC conditions or when the methods, in fact, cause the accident.I was not aware of that. Now I am. Learned my one thing from today, now I'm done.
My point was center management are not trying to determine who was at fault to what degree in a crash. We are trying to determine did the driver follow the methods per his training and do everything reasonably possible to avoid a crash.
And never look at the "what could happen" if it were done their way.But they often omit pertinent facts. Like management instructing driver to deliver in EC conditions or when the methods, in fact, cause the accident.
But they often omit pertinent facts. Like management instructing driver to deliver in EC conditions or when the methods, in fact, cause the accident.
Why is it you always assume other drivers are in the wrong?
No, because then she would have sued UPS for me obstructing her view in her mirror...And it would then be upheld as an avoidable accident.29 years has shown me that the vast majority are.
Did you think to put a d-note on her drivers side window letting her know that you were parked behind her?
You are naive to believe that the methods do not, in some cases, cause others to react in an unsafe manner. Which in some cases, cause the crash.Not familiar with such cases. I never omitted pertinent facts. I would also suggest if someone claims following the driving methods caused them to crash they are not following the methods properly.
You are naive to believe that the methods do not, in some cases, cause others to react in an unsafe manner. Which in some cases, cause the crash.
Not familiar with such cases. I never omitted pertinent facts. I would also suggest if someone claims following the driving methods caused them to crash they are not following the methods properly.
And sets us up for the other party's lawyer to sue the crap out of us !This.
Investigating an accident any finding of unavoidable will be questioned. Avoidable not so much. I was grilled by the district ops manager on the head on I determined unavoidable. I stood my ground and stuck to the facts.
The reason the system is setup that way is to avoid accepting complacent non defensive driving that holds no one accountable for not doing all they can to avoid accidents caused by others.