you don’t understand. I want you to vote no. I want to see you laid off.
Enough with the threats. Everyone has their opinion on this contract, right or wrong. But throwing out strikes and layoffs, as much as they are a possibility, have the same chances of happening as a renegotiated contract with no work stoppage. And the renegotiation is the only thing that benefits all parties.
The company can't hire enough people to perform the job now, good luck replacing us. And the union wants our dues and keep the status quo. A no vote will simply put everyone back at the table to work towards the concerns that have been voiced since the contract was released and reviewed.
State your opinions, make your case. I don't agree with it, but that's fine. But the no vote will cause all these extreme case scenarios is old.
. Vote No. There are substantial issues in wages and working conditions that have not been addressed with the members. We don't need non-answers....we need concrete, not open to interpretation language in the CBA protecting FT package car drivers rights to OT; new language for RPCDs to match the 22.4 language regarding 8 hours, 5 consecutive days and 40 hours per week. We need concrete language on start times for RPCDs; $15 start wage and catch up raises for the PTers that are busting their erses. We need to see the upcoming Teamcare benefits summary plan. etc, etc. The proposed agreement is a joke. The scare tactics are not. Scare tactics are downright intimidation vote yes under duress coercion. VOTE this heaping pile of do do down.
ing disgrace
