Can unions even reasonably exist without laws recognizing them?Do any of them require the president to increase union membership?
Wat about the anti union legislation that already exists?
Can unions even reasonably exist without laws recognizing them?Do any of them require the president to increase union membership?
They hate private unions too lolActually , the GOP only hates public unions.
Deems they to be useless.
Ya that's why SOB was invited to the RNC while the Democrats crapped on him.They hate private unions too lol
They hate private unions too lol
Shaddup, scabCan unions even reasonably exist without laws recognizing them?
Wat about the anti union legislation that already exists?
lol you always fall for the theatreYa that's why SOB was invited to the RNC while the Democrats crapped on him.
They hate private unions too lol
Ya that's why SOB was invited to the RNC while the Democrats crapped on him.
The theatre was watching you toe the line Democrat voters get crapped on. Lol.lol you always fall for the theatre
What about it? Name one law that requires the president to increase union membership?Can unions even reasonably exist without laws recognizing them?
Wat about the anti union legislation that already exists?
this was a bad oneWhat about it? Name one law that requires the president to increase union membership?
why is union membership only semi political affair in vantexans eyes. it makes no sense.Ricky's B Law.
fixed it for ui make no sense.
Does the Taft-Hartley Act require the president to increase union membership?this was a bad one
i dont see the logic in why you say the president shouldnt be involved at all, but its okay for congress to be involved haha
Taft–Hartley Act - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Unions are involved in politics. But for some reason you think it's the president's responsibility to increase union membership. It's up to the unions to do that.why is union membership only semi political affair in vantexans eyes. it makes no sense.
and congress should have nothing to do with it as well?Unions are involved in politics. But for some reason you think it's the president's responsibility to increase union membership. It's up to the unions to do that.
jesus would be much happier if it didDoes the Taft-Hartley Act require the president to increase union membership?
and politics is involved in unions is it not hahaUnions are involved in politics. But for some reason you think it's the president's responsibility to increase union membership. It's up to the unions to do that.
It's their job to increase union membership?and congress should have nothing to do with it as well?
So? Unions support the party they think will help them the most. Just like every other special interest.and politics is involved in unions is it not haha
Ricky, Jesus cares about everybody, not just the people you favor.jesus would be much happier if it did