YesIt's their job to increase union membership?
YesIt's their job to increase union membership?
Wrong. He sides with the poor, the marginalizedRicky, Jesus cares about everybody, not just the people you favor.
So if politics is involved in unions why not increase the membership rate instead of the oppositeSo? Unions support the party they think will help them the most. Just like every other special interest.
He cares about everybody. You need to crack open your Bible instead of listening to Integrity.Wrong. He sides with the poor, the marginalized
It's up to the unions to increase their membership.So if politics is involved in unions why not increase the membership rate instead of the opposite
How so? Can you cite the Constitution?
He picks sides if its the rich vs the poorHe cares about everybody. You need to crack open your Bible instead of listening to Integrity.
But politics is involved. Wat to do about the politicians and their lawsIt's up to the unions to increase their membership.
Are you saying get rid of all union lawsHow so? Can you cite the Constitution?
He's not looking to make it rich vs poor. He just reminds us that it's very difficult to enter heaven as a rich man. And that we must help the poor.He picks sides if its the rich vs the poor
When did I say that? You're attacking presidents for not increasing union membership but nowhere in the Constitution or subsequent laws is there a requirement for them to do so.Are you saying get rid of all union laws
Politics are involved in everything of consequence.But politics is involved. Wat to do about the politicians and their laws
Something I thought of that Congress could do to compromise on both sides while helping the working class, is to encourage companies to unionize by offering them special tax breaks if they doWhen did I say that? You're attacking presidents for not increasing union membership but nowhere in the Constitution or subsequent laws is there a requirement for them to do so.
i say you can judge a president by how much union membership went up.When did I say that? You're attacking presidents for not increasing union membership but nowhere in the Constitution or subsequent laws is there a requirement for them to do so.
i was watching a video and im pretty sure the reverend said that. ill rewatch it.He's not looking to make it rich vs poor. He just reminds us that it's very difficult to enter heaven as a rich man. And that we must help the poor.
It would have to be an exceptionally large tax break to offset the costs a union would give them. And companies don't unionize, their workers do.Something I thought of that Congress could do to compromise on both sides while helping the working class, is to encourage companies to unionize by offering them special tax breaks if they do
Can you name a president who caused union membership to go up? If so it would be because his policies were extremely anti labor, not because he forced companies to accept a union, which he can't do.i say you can judge a president by how much union membership went up.
its a question.
unions are bad for profits, good for workers, good for democracyIt would have to be an exceptionally large tax break to offset the costs a union would give them. And companies don't unionize, their workers do.
FDRCan you name a president who caused union membership to go up? If so it would be because his policies were extremely anti labor, not because he forced companies to accept a union, which he can't do.
god loves everyone but when there is an oppression god takes sides with the oppressed for example. when there is rich and poor god takes sides with the poor.He's not looking to make it rich vs poor. He just reminds us that it's very difficult to enter heaven as a rich man. And that we must help the poor.