The union isn't broken. The contract was made by and vote by the union which means, if it passed, you would accuse the majority as "broken".
The fact that may have been repeated shows how hard the reading comprehension, heck, I need more time to understand what I am reading.
Sean's idea isn't part of the argument about the contract. The talk about Sean had nothing to do with the contract talks. It is beside the point. Period.
Please explains why 22.4 is a joke? And, no, I don't agree with the, if you aren't with me then you are against me. Don't bother. It is cheap.
Union and employer, arm by arm, although not literal as your opinion but they are written in the contract book.