We did it Boys!!! (Targay)

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Maybe gays are trying to counter act nut jobs who go around telling kids it’s a sin and god hates it. Maybe gays look at the history of it being illegal and punished by prison or castration or death and say huh, maybe we should argue with society about that.

You people routinely complain about gay rights and then deflect to well it’s because they are so loud about it. That’s just you lying to yourself again, especially when you view homosexuality as a sign of the fall of civilization lol.
If you look at the fall of many civilizations it often started with decadent rotting from within. There's nothing uplifting, no pun intended, about a bunch of guys grunting in a bathhouse.

Keep it to yourselves. And for the record heterosexuals need to be more modest too. When everything is reduced down to seeking sexual pleasure and all roads lead there then that society is on its way out. Sex happens, always has, always will. But when it's the be all, end all focus of any culture then we're all in trouble.
 

nWo

Well-Known Member
rtwh6wbq4w4b1.jpg
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
To Far Right Christians, you are married to anyone you have ever had sex with. Isn't that correct, van? Bible literalists (who believe every single word of it is true) have told me this multiple times. Sex is only for procreation, not pleasure.
There was a Redbook survey back in the 80's that found that Christian women were the most satisfied with their sex lives. Makes sense because imo it's difficult to have a satisfying relationship with multiple partners. And yes the Apostle Paul did speak of having sex with someone joins you together. But I've never heard any Christian claim that sex is strictly for procreation. That's more a Victorian era concept. The point of the pleasure is to insure the continuation of humanity.
 

Fred's Myth

Nonhyphenated American
There was a Redbook survey back in the 80's that found that Christian women were the most satisfied with their sex lives. Makes sense because imo it's difficult to have a satisfying relationship with multiple partners. And yes the Apostle Paul did speak of having sex with someone joins you together. But I've never heard any Christian claim that sex is strictly for procreation. That's more a Victorian era concept. The point of the pleasure is to insure the continuation of humanity.
MFE is as confused as always. The Roman Catholic Church teaches that the purpose of marriage (Sacrament of Matrimony) is for procreation, and that absent that for whatever reason, invalidates the sacramental aspect of marriage.

That's completely different from "Sex is only for procreation, not pleasure."
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
theres a relation between increasing private debts, increasing household prices, increasing inequality, increasing corruption and moronic identity fights like these.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
Tides are turning.
Time for the pedos to drown.

Does this mean the UK hates gay people, @El Correcto ?
No this means they are afraid of political repercussions

Of continuing to give puberty blockers and gender transition treatments to children. Good.

from people like you who do and view it as a fantasy.

Leave the children alone. Such hate.
 

El Correcto

god is dead
No conception can be stranger than one that supports giving children puberty blockers and gender transition treatments.
You view a medical diagnosis as a fantasy and believe it is a choice to be trans by peer pressure or whatever else.
Contrary to the evidence as per usual with your types.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
You view a medical diagnosis as a fantasy and believe it is a choice to be trans by peer pressure or whatever else.
Contrary to the evidence as per usual with your types.

Such "medical diagnoses" of children will be viewed by history as a big mistake, made by people who had an interest in making them or were too fearful to resist.
 

El Correcto

god is dead
Such "medical diagnoses" of children will be viewed by history as a big mistake, made by people who had an interest in making them or were too fearful to resist.
what interest do people have in forcing someone to be trans? Who is fearful of respectfully disagreeing with puberty blockers being given to children? I don’t take issue with that, what is disrespectful is declaring it chemical castration and saying gender dysphoria is just a fantasy. Those are the terrible ideas I strongly disagree with.
 
Top