Anonymous 12
Non active member
Because Liam is the union.Did the union call for a walkout? If not, why would they get sued? If they gave notice of a future strike, then again they are legally covered.
The problem I see is, who do you fire?
Because Liam is the union.Did the union call for a walkout? If not, why would they get sued? If they gave notice of a future strike, then again they are legally covered.
The problem I see is, who do you fire?
The 250 never should have walked out. I still think there were probably better ways to handle the situation. But.....being that there were so many involved I don't see how UPS could handle the repercussions if they actually tried to fire more than just a hand full of them. Not to mention all 250.
Exactly.Exactly. And that proves they are not REALLY fired, and will not lose their jobs.
As of Friday afternoon, all drivers were working. So, unless they walked them one by one out the building friday evening...and I doubt that...management doesn't like to stay late, especially on Fridays...lolI have yet to see the answer to that. 250 drivers cannot possibly be that easily and quickly replaced, right?
Right?
However, the drivers have been terminated, aka "fired", but are serving a "working termination" under article 7 of the NMA. Personally, if I was one of those drivers, I'd feel somewhat at ease being an article 7, especially if I have had an otherwise clean record.
I think I would be even more pissed off if the union allowed for a few to be fired and let the rest off the hook. We know the few fired would be the pro union drivers who do the job correctly while the kiss ass runners keep their jobs.
Think they will be ( working fired) . After the hearing they should get their jobs back. Great solidarity for 804 like the brotherhood.I have yet to see the answer to that. 250 drivers cannot possibly be that easily and quickly replaced, right?
Right?
pro-union will have nothing to do with it.the driver who has already developed a long history of discipline is the one that will lose their job in this one. Of course they are pro-union since the union has saved their skin many times already. If there are drivers in this group who have already gotten second chances at discharge hearings those are the ones the company will then be more then happy to take to the panel again. The drivers with clean records will be ok.
I'm in local 804 and a lot of the 250 drivers had know idea why they even walked out. There was mass confusion amongst those who walked. It's an unfortunate situation for those involved
Sent using BrownCafe App
There will be no winners here. The company can not let 250 drivers walkout with out repercussions. The union can not lose 250 members. They will agree on several sacrificial lambs that way the company can have some scalps and the union can say they saved almost all the jobs. The whole issue is now saving face and who loses least.
How 'bout the rest of the drivers? Did they not get the message to walk, or did they not want to?250 makes up roughly 2/3rds of the drivers there
Sent using BrownCafe App
How 'bout the rest of the drivers? Did they not get the message to walk, or did they not want to?
They will agree on several sacrificial lambs that way the company can have some scalps and the union can say they saved almost all the jobs.