Did they (the 250) work that day?
First of all, lets understand what is in our contract. The LOCAL is prohibited from calling a "wildcat" strike and so are the members. This was an action by the members that was improper and violated our national master agreement.
No matter what the situation, we can never "WILDCAT" the company. Its an automatic termination for any employee who engages in this process. We as members can NEVER interupt the business.
While the cause may have been good, and the rationale behind it honest, it can never be done.
Everyone will be restored once the smoke clears, the company CANNOT take some back and not "people they dont like" as suggested.
You take one back, you take them ALL back. There are no exceptions.
Lets not make this a bigger deal than it is. The local will work it all out.
TOS.
Part timers that have been thrown under the bus by drivers in every single contract would never honor a strike. Many certainly wouldn't pass up a chance to take those drivers' jobs. Personally I would love a strike... I could use a vacation.Here is a solution.....If UPS fires even one driver, everyone in the Local and the Nation should strike. friend UPS, the harassment has to stop.
Part timers that have been thrown under the bus by drivers in every single contract would never honor a strike. Many certainly wouldn't pass up a chance to take those drivers' jobs. Personally I would love a strike... I could use a vacation.
In reality the drivers will keep their jobs and the machine will keep running business as usual. Firing these drivers is bad for both sides.
Ya, because the geniuses that get an $8.50 an hour back breaking job are smart enough to stand up for their rights(self fulfilling prophecy).... this is a line of conversation that has enough threads already to have it's own forum, I have no interest in hijacking this thread in that direction.I wonder who has more voters? Part-timers or drivers/feeders?
My guess (I know it) is part-timers have more voters.
They could throw us under the bus if they bothered to just vote, and mail it in.
The part-timers are jumping under the bus all by themselves.
Ya, because the geniuses that get an $8.50 an hour back breaking job are smart enough to stand up for their rights(self fulfilling prophecy).... this is a line of conversation that has enough threads already to have it's own forum, I have no interest in hijacking this thread in that direction.
My point was in reply to a person who talked about the delusion of a national strike over 250 drivers in one local.... it's just never going to happen.
I also find it very interesting that driveindriveout rated my post "derail" when I was just responding to his post.
.... this is a line of conversation that has enough threads already to have it's own forum, I have no interest in hijacking this thread in that direction.
Yes. According to the stories on the front page of BC, they struck for 90 minutes.
Yes. According to the stories on the front page of BC, they struck for 90 minutes.
So in other words they were all an hour and a half late for work. Not something to get fired for, unless they clocked in first, then walked out. If your start time is 8:30 AM, and you "walk out", get sick, got stuck in traffic, then end result is they all went to work that day late. I think that's a strong argument for keeping their jobs.
The strike of 1997, in my building not a single PT crossed. Not even pre seniority PT. Had a hand full of package car drivers cross.Part timers that have been thrown under the bus by drivers in every single contract would never honor a strike. Many certainly wouldn't pass up a chance to take those drivers' jobs. Personally I would love a strike... I could use a vacation.
In reality the drivers will keep their jobs and the machine will keep running business as usual. Firing these drivers is bad for both sides.
The PTers in Local 89 did vote and turned down the contract and supplement. Now the complaint from other Union members is that they are holding up every ones raises.I wonder who has more voters? Part-timers or drivers/feeders?
My guess (I know it) is part-timers have more voters.
They could throw us under the bus if they bothered to just vote, and mail it in.
The part-timers are jumping under the bus all by themselves.
My point was in reply to a person who talked about the delusion of a national strike over 250 drivers in one local.... it's just never going to happen.
I like that option. "Sick-outs" are a popular show of force for teachers, who have had their rights slowly chiseled down to nothing over the years. I remember a while back a district in Michigan actually had to cancel classes because of a sick-out.Won't be a strike, but I'd be willing to bet that there would be a significant increase in sick calls.