brett636
Well-Known Member
Well stated? Seriously? And, you have been trying to say this in this thread? Look, you have said this over and over about this case.
The problem with your hypothesis is that you rule out Martins rights to "self defense". What did Martin do to waive his rights to self defense?
Martin wasnt the one following Zimmerman. Martin knowing that Zimmerman was chasing him has a right to feel that "his" life may be in danger. He had a stranger with a gun chasing him in the dark. Martin has the right to defend himself, even if that meant lethal force.
Zimmerman had NO RIGHTS to pursue Martin, none whatsoever. Zimmerman over reached his "authority" ( and i say that mildly ) by pursuing Martin into the dark, and when confronted, you had TWO MEN with no idea what the other was going to do.
YOU both want to discount Trayvon Martins right to be left alone, he had committed NO CRIMES and all he had done to raise suspicion was to be BLACK in a white neighborhood.
You say Zimmerman is not a racist? Yet all his phone calls to the police over two years were for suspicious black guys. You BOTH say that Trayvon Martin wasnt a glowing example?
Really?
Here's a little something for you to digest. On that rainy night, the only one of the two with a confirmed criminal record was GEORGE ZIMMERMAN.
Zimmerman has had troubles with the law for years and Trayvon did not have a criminal record.
If you are attempting to make Zimmerman into a hero, then you are both fools. The real criminal on that night, was G. Zimmerman.
Peace
TOS
Thats a pretty loose definition of self defense. How do you function in society when you are running around sucker punching anyone who you feel may be following you and claiming self defense when that person has probably said nothing to you or tried to physically harm you in any way? Also, Zimmerman having a gun can't be a factor in any of this because there is no way Martin would have known he had a gun, but if he did I doubt this would have occurred.