BrownFlush
Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
"Faith comes from hearing the Word of God" -- ( Romans 10:17)
"Faith comes from hearing the Word of God" -- ( Romans 10:17)
No doubt about it.
jordan needs to stop being a pusillanimous and debate richard wolff
Baptism is an act of obedience to a command.Baptism is an action. Faith is a state of mind. You can't alter reality to fit your interpretation of scripture. Or are you saying you are baptized if you believe you are? Are you being purposefully contradictory? I mean you say baptism is not a work, then you say it is an act, right in the same sentence. I think you may have some issues you need to sort out.
We have one teacher. If you want to be a disciple of Paul, then be so, if you want to be a disciple of Peter, then be so. As a Christian, I am a disciple of Jesus.
If there is no faith (belief) there will be no baptism.0
He also said that "he who does not believe is condemned" not "he who is not baptized is comdemned".
But what of it? Believe and be baptized vs just believe. The point is you are not earning your salvation, even the wealthy young man who Jesus acknowledged followed the law could not save himself through acts. James' had the best explanation of salvation by faith vs salvation through good deeds. Faith without works is dead. Good deeds aren't enough by themselves. Just as baptism is an outward sign of your faith, so are good deeds, but those actions do not save you, your belief in Jesus and He who sent him saves you.
If something written by one of the apostles doesn't quite make sense, I always go to the actual authority, and do my best to interpret what they said within the context of the teachings of Jesus. Even some things Jesus taught I can't explain, but he is still the one Teacher, the rest of us are brothers.
I'm not arguing anything.I honestly don't know what you're arguing anymore. Break it down, what are your main issues with what has been said, and what is your scripture to back it up?
1. Does the gospel require immersion in water for salvation?And Jesus said whoever is not against us is for us.
Matthew 9:
38 “Teacher,” said John, “we saw someone driving out demons in your name and we told him to stop, because he was not one of us.”
39 “Do not stop him,” Jesus said. “For no one who does a miracle in my name can in the next moment say anything bad about me, 40 for whoever is not against us is for us. 41 Truly I tell you, anyone who gives you a cup of water in my name because you belong to the Messiah will certainly not lose their reward.
As for the baptism issue, I think we may not exactly agree on what that means. When I was talking about baptism being a symbol of faith, I specifically meant the water baptism. But baptism also means trial, hardship or difficulty. Jesus called his crucifixion a baptism. Our baptism, as followers of Jesus, can be seen as the trials and difficulties we will face as a result of following him. I don't know if that is what you are getting at or not.
We are all responsible for our own understanding of the scripture. We will necessarily interpret things differently. I don't believe we are meant to use our understanding as a bludgeon to keep others in line with what we think scripture means. But we are called to be like iron sharpening iron to help each other grow in our faith.
Let it be known that much of what has been talked about on this discussion thread from all points of view are common and different systematic viewpoints or schools of thought about faith, practice, theology, religion and truth. They are long standing arguments of theologians gone past.I'm not arguing anything.
I don't know of any issues except trying to do this on a cell phone.
i suspect he pussed outI did some digging into the matter, as far as I can tell, Peterson's issues are with cultural marxism, post-modernism, and the history of horrific violence that always seems to accompany the initiation of marxist economic systems. My guess is he probably recognizes there are people better suited to argue the actual economic issues. I'd rather see an actual economist debate Richard Wolff, I'm just not sure who any of the top pro-capitalism intellectual economists are these days.
Let it be knownLet it be known
It is my opinion (although someone may argue with this point and ask me for a Bible verse that states this...and then say he is not arguing)
On phone again... I couldn’t begin too answer all the reasons with my thumbs... maybe more on this later when computer is in front of meWhy do you love God?
Well said.Let it be known
When one ask for a Bible verse, that is not arguing. The one is simply asking for the scriptural authority of your opinion. If you have no verse to back up your opinion. it is simply that.
"And when he entered the temple, the chief priests and the elders of the people came up to him as he was teaching, and said, “By what authority are you doing these things, and who gave you this authority?” Jesus answered them, “I also will ask you one question, and if you tell me the answer, then I also will tell you by what authority I do these things.The baptism of John, from where did it come? From heaven or from man?" -- Matt .21: 23 -25
When it comes to eternity and spiritual things, the things one believes and teaches will do one no good if it comes from man.
Because I woke up. Because I got 2 healthy kids and a wife. A good job to provide. Because I was born in usa. Because I was in a bad car accident at 15 and walked away unhurt. Out of nowhere a priest came to pray with me while everyone else was unconscious and stuck in car while the ambulance was stuck on the other side of a freight trainWhy do you love God?
Let it be known
When one ask for a Bible verse, that is not arguing. The one is simply asking for the scriptural authority of your opinion. If you have no verse to back up your opinion. it is simply that.
"And when he entered the temple, the chief priests and the elders of the people came up to him as he was teaching, and said, “By what authority are you doing these things, and who gave you this authority?” Jesus answered them, “I also will ask you one question, and if you tell me the answer, then I also will tell you by what authority I do these things.The baptism of John, from where did it come? From heaven or from man?" -- Matt .21: 23 -25
When it comes to eternity and spiritual things, the things one believes and teaches will do one no good if it comes from man.
Yes you could be wrong.Well said.
Agree with most of this.
Still think you are at times using scripture to argue your points instead of simply stating your beliefs.
I could be wrong but it is just my opinion.
Enjoy your day!
When I first experienced God’s love for me I was prone to black and white thinking and living as well.Yes you could be wrong.
That’s the problem with opinions.
I use scripture to simply state what God said about whatever the issue. There is no argument.
If it runs counter to your position or belief, who are you disagreeing with? Not me .
This is a fact:
When two people discuss a passage in the Bible and they have two different opinions about what the passage is teaching and says, both cannot be right.
Both can be wrong, but only one can be right.
There can be only one right answer.
The Bible is it’s own best interrupter. It reveals The truth.
Rejecting what God says is nothing new. People have done it for centuries.
Thanks for the contribution, very well put.None of the scriptures you cite really, definitively prove any of the points you apparently aren't arguing. Mark 16:16 does not mention water. James 2:24 doesn't mention baptism at all, as you seem to suggest.
1 Peter 3:21 and this water symbolizes baptism that now saves you also—not the removal of dirt from the body but the pledge of a clear conscience toward God. It saves you by the resurrection of Jesus Christ,
Wow, ok, the verse you referenced says directly water is a symbol of baptism. Do you read the verses you reference first?
John 3:5 Jesus answered, “Very truly I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless they are born of water and the Spirit.
Ok, very simply put. Direct from the mouth of the teacher. I can agree that he is talking about being baptized by water. That doesn't mean it's not symbolic.
Accepting the gift of salvation requires repentance, for sure, and we are not saved by that repentance as we are not saved by baptism, I think we agree on that.
You say you have to be water baptized to wash away your sin, though Jesus didn't say that.
1 John 1:7 But if we live in the light, as God does, we share in life with each other. And the blood of his Son Jesus washes all our sins away.
Matthew 3:11 "I baptize with water those who repent of their sins and turn to God. But someone is coming soon who is greater than I am--so much greater that I'm not worthy even to be his slave and carry his sandals. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire."
Mark 10:38 “You don’t know what you are asking,” Jesus said. “Can you drink the cup I drink or be baptized with the baptism I am baptized with?”
So, does the water of baptism wash your sins away? Or is it the blood of Christ? If it's the blood, why do we need the water? If it's the water, why would we need the blood? If faith and water baptism was all we needed, why the sacrifice? What faith does it really take to be dunked under water? It can only really be seen as a symbolic gesture, as Peter said. We are baptized by the blood of Christ, my friend, and perhaps, the fire of the Holy Spirit. Baptism is certainly necessary for salvation, being dunked is a symbol.