1 in 4 women have abortions? Wow.

W

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
bacha29 said:
Are you willing to pay for contraception so that your daughter can enjoy her youth and sexuality in a responsible manner? And don't try your religious virtues with me. I know of numerous preacher's daughters and granddaughters who got knocked up unmarried in their mid teens.
Click to expand...
No, I'm not willing to pay for contraception for anyone, especially for my daughter. You've got to be kidding.
 
W

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
bacha29 said:
Iceland does NOT have to provide with support for your views. They are a sovereign nation with their own laws

And just exactly what additional funds are you willing to contribute to ensure that the kids who will be brought full term even if the mother doesn't want to will have everything they will need to better insure that they will have a safe and secure childhood? or are you just another consercuk with no bucks.? You're the guy who has set out to save them and then after you do save them what are you going to do?
Click to expand...
Mothers in every state already have free everything. Chill out.
 
B

bacha29

Well-Known Member
DriveInDriveOut said:
Do you realize every argument you make in support of killing human babies is about money?

What does that say about you and your morals, or lack there of?
Click to expand...
Just as I figured Another consercuk with no bucks. You still just don't get it. The issue as has been discussed numerous times today is this nation's unpreparedness and with you people's unwillingness to take the steps needed so that the prenatal post natal adolescent healthcare and childcare educational opportunities will be available when it's needed if there is and likely will be a major uptick in births whether planned or unplanned wanted or not. Which is worse? A woman who did not plan to get pregnant or a nation that did not bother plan to accommodate the consequences resulting from the overturning a 50 year old piece of finished law? The overturn has been done. Measures must be now taken and most importantly....THERE IS NO CHEAP WAY OUT.
 
W

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
bacha29 said:
Just as I figured Another consercuk with no bucks. You still just don't get it. The issue as has been discussed numerous times today is this nation's unpreparedness and with you people's unwillingness to take the steps needed so that the prenatal post natal adolescent healthcare and childcare educational opportunities will be available when it's needed if there is and likely will be a major uptick in births whether planned or unplanned wanted or not. Which is worse? A woman who did not plan to get pregnant or a nation that did not bother plan to accommodate the consequences resulting from the overturning a 50 year old piece of finished law? The overturn has been done. Measures must be now taken and most importantly....THERE IS NO CHEAP WAY OUT.
Click to expand...
Every baby has a line of adopting parents waiting for them. Every poor mother has free health care, food, shelter, and clothes

Stop whining on behalf of whores.
 
B

bacha29

Well-Known Member
wilberforce15 said:
Mothers in every state already have free everything. Chill out.
Click to expand...
And there could very easily be many more seeking benefits to which the law entitles them to. After getting your own way with the abortion ban now you not only want to refuse funding to the women who are now forced to carry a full term fetus you now want to cut benefits to the women who are currently receiving them.
 
W

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
bacha29 said:
And there could very easily be many more seeking benefits to which the law entitles them to. After getting your own way with the abortion ban now you not only want to refuse funding to the women who are now forced to carry a full term fetus you now want to cut benefits to the women who are currently receiving them.
Click to expand...
So, you're whining about what might happen, while acknowledging that poor women already have everything they need?
 
W

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
bacha29 said:
You just got done talking about the kids who are currently waiting for adoption . Now which way is it?
Click to expand...
There are no babies waiting for adoption.
There are foster kids who can't find permanent homes, mainly because whenever foster kids go into homes, they molest and assault their benefactors.
 
B

bacha29

Well-Known Member
wilberforce15 said:
So, you're whining about what might happen, while acknowledging that poor women already have everything they need?
Click to expand...
You see what Ohio is smartly doing. Finding the funding that will be needed in the post Roe era. for Ohio a billion bucks is a lot when you consider that it's general fund budget is only 22B Now lets see how they're going to raise the extra cash. Now lets wee what Mississippi the poorest state in the nation is going to do to raise all that extra benefit cash that will be needed.
 
B

bacha29

Well-Known Member
wilberforce15 said:
There are no babies waiting for adoption.
There are foster kids who can't find permanent homes, mainly because whenever foster kids go into homes, they molest and assault their benefactors.
Click to expand...
I know a couple who raised 6 foster kids. NOTHING like you say happened in that household. In keeping wit that how many foster kids did you take in and what were your experiences with them?
 
W

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
bacha29 said:
You see what Ohio is smartly doing. Finding the funding that will be needed in the post Roe era. for Ohio a billion bucks is a lot when you consider that it's general fund budget is only 22B Now lets see how they're going to raise the extra cash. Now lets wee what Mississippi the poorest state in the nation is going to do to raise all that extra benefit cash that will be needed.
Click to expand...
The funding isn't needed. There are adoptive parents for every baby. And a line a mile long.

And poor mothers already have free everything.

There is no need.
 
W

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
bacha29 said:
I know a couple who raised 6 foster kids. NOTHING like you say happened in that household. In keeping wit that how many foster kids did you take in and what were your experiences with them?
Click to expand...
Did they raise 6 foster kids alongside their own natural kids?
If so, they simply didn't see it. It happened.
And they also go 500 to 1000 per month for each kid.
 

Similar threads

Catatonic
UPS Work Ethic - IS America Losing It?
5 6 7
Replies
135
Views
18K
govols019
govols019
JimJimmyJames
A liberal finally admits: abortion is murder!
8 9 10
Replies
188
Views
17K
Non liberal
N
The Other Side
Hypocrite at the head of the Republican Committee
Replies
5
Views
2K
tieguy
tieguy
wkmac
Newt & the Weapon of Fear
2
Replies
23
Views
4K
wkmac
wkmac
T
4th of July
Replies
18
Views
3K
traveler
T
Top