oldngray
nowhere special
starting with Sanctuary Cities.
Bill O'Reilly becoming a Non-Factor
- Thread starter Catatonic
- Start date
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
It's not a city's responsibility to enforce immigration laws.
oldngray
nowhere special
Agreed. Nor to interfere and block feds from enforcing the laws.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
The laws they failed to enforce on multiple levels and are now complaining that the states and cities won't enforce for them?
oldngray
nowhere special
The laws they failed to enforce under Obama and are trying to enforce now you mean?
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Oh right, Silly me.
I forgot Obama is to blame for everything, what was I thinking.
I guess we'll just have to yearn for the good old days before Obama when there was no illegal immigration.
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
I didn't know undocumented immigration started under Obama?
oldngray
nowhere special
No but that was when illegal aliens began to be referred to by a different name.
Every last one of them took an oath to uphold the Constitution of the U.S.. They can't pick and choose which Federal laws they won't uphold. Not practical to hold them all responsible? Fine, withhold Federal money from them for not complying. If state and local laws only apply then state and local money is all that's needed. Let their constituents at the voting booth choose to agree or disagree. See there, checks and balances. California likes to point out they are the world's 6th largest economy. They certainly don't need Federal money then.
The most politically correct administration ever. I wonder if they would've hurt themselves trying to describe Muslim illegals.
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
Where in the constitution does it state cities must enforce immigration laws?
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Hey man, did you hear that Bill O'Reilly is a giant bag of dicks?
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
I find it telling that O'Reilly was only let go after the advertisers left.
Clearly Fox hasn't turned over a new leaf in terms of employee relations vis-a-vis sexual harrassment (which seems to be rampant in their organization), they just made a bottom-line $ decision.
Don't cry for O'Reilly - his $25M golden parachute and continuing book deals mean that he'll be just fine.
But let's be clear - O'Reilly is a serial offender, and he should have been let go years ago.
Don't let the door hit you where the good Lord split you!
Clearly Fox hasn't turned over a new leaf in terms of employee relations vis-a-vis sexual harrassment (which seems to be rampant in their organization), they just made a bottom-line $ decision.
Don't cry for O'Reilly - his $25M golden parachute and continuing book deals mean that he'll be just fine.
But let's be clear - O'Reilly is a serial offender, and he should have been let go years ago.
Don't let the door hit you where the good Lord split you!
wkmac
Well-Known Member
Does say a lot doesn't it!
I also don't think that is an isolated problem either and what does that say?
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
It says that in 2017 the 'mad men' culture is alive and well, and that, all things considered, $ still has the loudest voice.
But that's not a surprise, is it?
Catatonic
Nine Lives
I smell states' police forces depending on the US Central Government to give them money.
Catatonic
Nine Lives
Quid Pro Quo
STATE: We aren't going to hold 'em
FEDS: I'll give you money if you holdem for us
CITY: We know better than the US National Laws
FEDS: What do we do with the money we were giving you to help with unregistered aliens?
STATE/CITY: That's not fair!!!
FEDS: Life's not fair.
UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)
Well-Known Member
Ours received a SWAT vehicle.
Catatonic
Nine Lives
Splitting hairs but technically correct.
Money in this case is "resources" ... could be training, could be assets, could be funding.
UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)
Well-Known Member
Fair enough.
DC budgets x amount per year for protests. They have blown their budget just in the first 100 days. Should they be reimbursed or should they just "suck it up"?
Similar threads
