Bill O'Reilly becoming a Non-Factor

[vantexan]

Fox is conservative but never liked Trump. They support RINO's and NeverTrumpers. There has been a noticeable shift to the left since Rupert Murdoch's son took over. They are becoming much more like all of the other media sources. I was never a fan of O'Reilly but the situation was very poorly handled.

Except for Sean Hannity. Saw an article last night that said Murdoch's sons might go after Hannity for supporting Trump so adamantly. If so they'd be killing FOX.

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

Never said that.

Sure you did.

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

Are you of the opinion that everyone who enters the country illegally and is apprehended near the border with no proof of residency should get a trial? Everyone who arrives by plane who overstayed their visa should get a trial?

Are you of the opinion that everyone who does those things is a criminal, because that's what we're talking about.

And bill oreilly is still an ass hat.

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

if they don't address the problem then they are the problem not the person that points this out on a message board.

They did address the problem, otherwise we wouldn't be talking about it. And then you came on here to blame the victim.

 

[vantexan]

Are you of the opinion that everyone who does those things is a criminal, because that's what we're talking about.

And bill oreilly is still an ass hat.

AGAIN, sigh, crossing the border illegally is a civil matter, not a criminal one. That does not give the person doing it the right to stay however.

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

AGAIN, sigh, crossing the border illegally is a civil matter, not a criminal one. That does not give the person doing it the right to stay however.

So why did you bring them up asking me if they deserved a trial in a discussion about deporting criminals? You said people who entered or stayed illegally that are charged with a crime should be deported without a trial. That's all we disagree on, constitutional rights.

 

[vantexan]

So why did you bring them up asking me if they deserved a trial in a discussion about deporting criminals?

You seem to be of the opinion that they shouldn't be deported for any reason without a trial first. And if they are found innocent they shouldn't be deported. Deportation for being here illegally is separate from any crime that may or may not have been committed. And the state may determine that the best way to handle some situations is deportation in lieu of a trial. Is this really that complicated?

 

[vantexan]

O'Reilly was different when he first started. Much saner. I agree about Wallace but nobody pays any attention to him. Megyn thought she was more important than the news and tried to make everything about her. After she used Fox to make a name for herself chased those dollar signs and jumped ship.

Sorry I was persisting with the wrong spelling of her name. You have it correct.

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

You seem to be of the opinion that they shouldn't be deported for any reason without a trial first.

I'm of the opinion that cities and states shouldn't be obligated to do the job of the federal government.

If you want to talk immigration reform, I'd suggest we deport D* bags that sexually harass their coworkers like bill oreilly.

 

[moreluck]

I'm of the opinion that cities and states shouldn't be obligated to do the job of the federal government.

If you want to talk immigration reform, I'd suggest we deport D* bags that sexually harass their coworkers like bill oreilly.

like he's the only one....Bill Clinton's gotta go too by your rule

 

[vantexan]

I'm of the opinion that cities and states shouldn't be obligated to do the job of the federal government.

If you want to talk immigration reform, I'd suggest we deport D* bags that sexually harass their coworkers like bill oreilly.

You throwing Bill Clinton out with him? And cities and states aren't being required to do the job of the Federal government. Those that claim "sanctuary" status are trying to inhibit the Federal gov't from doing it's job. In response the Federal gov't is saying if they aren't willing to obey Federal law they shouldn't receive Federal funds.

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

You throwing Bill Clinton out with him?

Sure they can have both bills and Hillary, take the pervert and sexual harasser trump too while they're at it.

Those that claim "sanctuary" status are trying to inhibit the Federal gov't from doing it's job. In response the Federal gov't is saying if they aren't willing to obey Federal law they shouldn't receive Federal funds.

So how long should a city be required to hold a kid who shoplifted while the federal government tries to get their together and do their job?

 

[vantexan]

Sure they can have both bills and Hillary, take the pervert and sexual harasser trump too while they're at it.

So how long should a city be required to hold a kid who shoplifted while the federal government tries to get their together and do their job?

Are you under the impression that they're holding them? Many sanctuary cities are releasing them rather than turn them over to the Fed's. Not a matter of them waiting, they aren't even contacting the Fed's.

 

[It will be fine]

MSNBC, CBS, NBC, CNN, ABC, NY Times, Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, Chicago Sun-Times, Democrat National Committee are all vile organizations that supported a predator in the White House, and his spouse who helped to cover it up. Of those women, and we have no idea how many more there were, only one, Paula Jones, got compensated anywhere close to the victims at FOX News. And don't give me the "job one depends on" business. These were highly compensated women who went after O'Reilly when things didn't go their way. One was verbally abused, not sexually. And there were 5. And I said repeatedly what he did was wrong. Doesn't matter to you, just an opportunity to attack.

You are delusional if you think the only people O'reily harassed over the last 2 decades were the 5 that got paid. He's a sexual predator, he undoubtedly harassed scores of women, that's what predators do.

 

[vantexan]

You are delusional if you think the only people O'reily harassed over the last 2 decades were the 5 that got paid. He's a sexual predator, he undoubtedly harassed scores of women, that's what predators do.

Or, as is the case in workplaces all over this country, he approached women and suggested they get together, and many were happy to. Women do the same thing. It happens everywhere with everyone at some point. From a Christian perspective I believe men and women should pair up in early adulthood in marriage and be faithful to each other. In practice many adults, including Christians like myself, didn't do that and the reality is it's very difficult to ignore your sex drive, especially when in close proximity of the opposite sex. People give into temptation but the theme seems to be that men are always predators and women are always innocent victims. Baloney.

 

[It will be fine]

Or, as is the case in workplaces all over this country, he approached women and suggested they get together, and many were happy to. Women do the same thing. It happens everywhere with everyone at some point. From a Christian perspective I believe men and women should pair up in early adulthood in marriage and be faithful to each other. In practice many adults, including Christians like myself, didn't do that and the reality is it's very difficult to ignore your sex drive, especially when in close proximity of the opposite sex. People give into temptation but the theme seems to be that men are always predators and women are always innocent victims. Baloney.

No theme here. O'Reilly is a predator. He is a scumbag. I've never had a problem interacting with women at work. It's not very difficult to not harass them. It's never the victims fault. Why is a good Christian defending a predator?

 

[vantexan]

No theme here. O'Reilly is a predator. He is a scumbag. I've never had a problem interacting with women at work. It's not very difficult to not harass them. It's never the victims fault. Why is a good Christian defending a predator?

I'm not. But ye who are without sin cast the first stone.

 

[ImWaitingForTheDay]

My point is....why don't they come forward when the actions take place? Why wait around suffering in silence waiting for the big payday? Bogus!

It's not always easy for women to "just leave" a company even IF it's a media company. That's Morelocks exact suggestion for women that are being harassed. There are plenty of women in situations all over America that had to stay in situations like that. THAT"S why those women are easy targets for men like Ailes and O'Reilly.

 

[ImWaitingForTheDay]

No theme here. O'Reilly is a predator. He is a scumbag. I've never had a problem interacting with women at work. It's not very difficult to not harass them. It's never the victims fault. Why is a good Christian defending a predator?

In other words, hypocrites.But,hypocrite doesn't quite cut it.

 

[Catatonic]

No theme here. O'Reilly is a predator. He is a scumbag. I've never had a problem interacting with women at work. It's not very difficult to not harass them. It's never the victims fault. Why is a good Christian defending a predator?

Reminds me of King David.