bottomups
Bad Moon Risen'
Anyone can post on VAERS. Lots of liars out there.
climate catastrophe
- Thread starter rickyb
- Start date
ive always just thought of jesus as a gifted rebel
problem ppl have is they start at the wrong place. i used to love FOX news when i was in high school. michael moores movies always made sense to me and the matrix, and thats when i became skeptical of everything. like i was the only one of my friends not to use their full name on facebook.
Dum preloader
Banned
It's true, you just dont want to admit that it's true.
It does not prove my theory but it certainly supports it.
You attacked my character because I have an unpopular theory that I can support with truth.
The surgical mask is a bad fit for risk reduction
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Consumer Reports: Coronavirus & COVID-19 Updates - Consumer Reports
With coronavirus and COVID-19 posing a public health crisis, Consumer Reports keeps you up to date on the virus and shares advice on how to keep yourself and family safe with these coronavirus updates.
www.consumerreports.org
Worst Pills Best Pills
An expert, independent second opinion on more than 1,800 prescription drugs, over-the-counter medications, and supplements
www.worstpills.org
And that's the liberal line, they're all liars. Vaccinations are the cure that liberals can sign on to. Seems there are liars all over the place.
How can it be true if you can't prove it? And I'd tell any Christian the same thing. There are too many conspiracy theories floating around that may have a grain of truth but are designed to instill fear of other groups. It's divisive, it's corrosive, and Christians shouldn't participate. I guess that includes me with the 2020 election. Seems enough there to question the legitimacy but I don't have proof. And I know what some are going to say. Christianity is based on faith. Some things just have to be taken on faith.
Wally
BrownCafe Innovator & King of Puns
Dum preloader
Banned
@vantexan
I proved that the policy is true and I proved that the result of the policy would be bad numbers.
You wanted proof of numbers.
I proved that the policy is true and I proved that the result of the policy would be bad numbers.
Dum preloader
Banned
Jesus is God manifested in flesh.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
The Feds Pile Up Vaccine 'Adverse Event' Reports as They Decry Scaremongering Elsewhere
Above right, from a brochure for the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. It solicits the sorts of unverified reports that officials and major media censure as dangerous elsewhere. By Clayt
Red Boxes Page - OpenVAERS
openvaers.com
“There are many reasons why the VAERS data is usually insufficient to prove causality between vaccination and adverse events, including:
- There is no reliable denominator to establish event rates – and no “control” group against which to measure adverse events.
- Reports are often messy or incomplete.
- Underreporting has been a consistent and documented issue. (One CDC studyshows that the system may capture as few as 12% of adverse events, meaning the total for COVID-19 vaccines could be as high as 10.8 million.)
- On the other hand, overreporting is also an issue, as noted in this 2003 CDC review: “Other potential reporting biases include increased reporting in the first few years after licensure, increased reporting of events occurring soon after vaccination, and increased reporting after publicity about a particular known or alleged type of adverse event.”
- In the case of childhood vaccinations, vaccine sets are co-administered, making it nearly impossible to know which specific vaccine caused the adverse event.
So you see why there will be no further Studies they can just use VAERS and say it doesn’t prove anything. So we don’t need to study. Even though the original used for the reporting website was to do exactly that.
Remember behind everyone of those numbers is the actual human being whose life was either ruined or finish.
have you ever used these websites before for news???The Feds Pile Up Vaccine 'Adverse Event' Reports as They Decry Scaremongering Elsewhere
Above right, from a brochure for the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. It solicits the sorts of unverified reports that officials and major media censure as dangerous elsewhere. By Claytwww.realclearinvestigations.com
Red Boxes Page - OpenVAERS
“There are many reasons why the VAERS data is usually insufficient to prove causality between vaccination and adverse events, including:
So why continue using an unreliable system – apart from the fact it was required by Congress? Experts agree that VAERS can be extremely useful in picking up signals of causation, which can be confirmed with further study.”
- There is no reliable denominator to establish event rates – and no “control” group against which to measure adverse events.
- Reports are often messy or incomplete.
- Underreporting has been a consistent and documented issue. (One CDC studyshows that the system may capture as few as 12% of adverse events, meaning the total for COVID-19 vaccines could be as high as 10.8 million.)
- On the other hand, overreporting is also an issue, as noted in this 2003 CDC review: “Other potential reporting biases include increased reporting in the first few years after licensure, increased reporting of events occurring soon after vaccination, and increased reporting after publicity about a particular known or alleged type of adverse event.”
- In the case of childhood vaccinations, vaccine sets are co-administered, making it nearly impossible to know which specific vaccine caused the adverse event.
So you see why there will be no further Studies they can just use VAERS and say it doesn’t prove anything. So we don’t need to study. Even though the original used for the reporting website was to do exactly that.
ive never even heard of htem before
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Open VARES is the government own data compiled. You can even get more in depth if you go on the wonder website.
It’s not my fault you don’t do any real investigating of your own maybe if Chris Hedges or the gnome Chomsky tells you you’ll believe it? It’s clear there’s no conspiracy to cover up the fact that the vaccine has caused much injury what’s not clear is why they are not upfront about it.
Dum preloader
Banned
Are there any questions I can answer for you that would strengthen your faith?
I could be wrong about all of this stuff, but one thing I am certain of is that Jesus Christ is Lord.
not
wat cr, wpbp says
Who's policy? How did you prove it true? Saying it's so doesn't necessarily make it so.
So am I.
Dum preloader
Banned
The cdc's 2 week policy regarding who is considered vaccinated or not. Proven true. Theoretically proven that it is possible to have produced bad numbers.
Or they had an adverse reaction and recovered. Not everyone who had an adverse reaction died or ended up injured for life. I think it's a good indication that the vaccines aren't safe for everyone.The Feds Pile Up Vaccine 'Adverse Event' Reports as They Decry Scaremongering Elsewhere
Above right, from a brochure for the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. It solicits the sorts of unverified reports that officials and major media censure as dangerous elsewhere. By Clayt
Red Boxes Page - OpenVAERS
“There are many reasons why the VAERS data is usually insufficient to prove causality between vaccination and adverse events, including:
So why continue using an unreliable system – apart from the fact it was required by Congress? Experts agree that VAERS can be extremely useful in picking up signals of causation, which can be confirmed with further study.”
- There is no reliable denominator to establish event rates – and no “control” group against which to measure adverse events.
- Reports are often messy or incomplete.
- Underreporting has been a consistent and documented issue. (One CDC studyshows that the system may capture as few as 12% of adverse events, meaning the total for COVID-19 vaccines could be as high as 10.8 million.)
- On the other hand, overreporting is also an issue, as noted in this 2003 CDC review: “Other potential reporting biases include increased reporting in the first few years after licensure, increased reporting of events occurring soon after vaccination, and increased reporting after publicity about a particular known or alleged type of adverse event.”
- In the case of childhood vaccinations, vaccine sets are co-administered, making it nearly impossible to know which specific vaccine caused the adverse event.
So you see why there will be no further Studies they can just use VAERS and say it doesn’t prove anything. So we don’t need to study. Even though the original used for the reporting website was to do exactly that.
Remember behind everyone of those numbers is the actual human being whose life was either ruined or finish.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Why is the government telling everyone in the world they should continue getting the shot? It is not working it has not stopped transmission and it is not even the same virus anymore. I think deep down you know the answer is “money”. Big Pharma making billionaires after billionaires while ignoring safety and the government is helping them do it?. I would think that would be something you would be against.
govts largely funded the r and d to make the vaccines
it was privatized. and greed prevented the 3rd world from accessing it.
Similar threads
