Election predictions

FedUPSer9816

Full Service
It's really easy. For example:

PA law absolutely, positively, clearly requires ballots to be received by election day.

Not postmarked by election day.

There isn't any question. It's not hard.

The judges and officials are simply ignoring the law.
The ballots received after election day, though post marked and mailed beforehand, are segregated and not included in the count. Biden has taken the lead in PA. Checkmate.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
I think you missed something very important in the last 4 years. Trump IS the Republican party now. The old GOP is unwelcome in OUR house... ;)
You go on and on about the radical Left and the dangers you claim they represent yet you appear to be a willing or should I say duped into membership of a group that represents a threat at least equal to the radical Left.....The radical Right whose leader is making every possible effort to overturn the results of the election.
 

JJinVA

Well-Known Member
You go on and on about the radical Left and the dangers you claim they represent yet you appear to be a willing or should I say duped into membership of a group that represents a threat at least equal to the radical Left.....The radical Right whose leader is making every possible effort to overturn the results of the election.
Cool story bro
 

Wally

BrownCafe Innovator & King of Puns
Sadly some Trumper conspiracy nut with an IQ under 80....no offense.. will probably be posting this pic on Facebook soon declaring that it is evidence of voter fraud!

Unless of course Giuliani beats him to it.
Zero transparency. Better to be fully honest and true. This way, if you win, you win. The other path earns you the label of fraud and illegitimacy. Americans accept loss but not cheating.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
of course state media never shows the truth . Twitter is heavily censoring conservatives right now . the integrity of the media has been flushed down the toilet with the big stinking turd which while also getting flushed has retained its integrity and always been a big stinky turd.
The networks shut him off because they had finally reached the end of their tolerance for Trump's claims and accusations with ZERO EVIDENCE to support his claims.

What we saw out of Trump was a desperate man terrified of what might happen to him when he no longer has the presidency to protect him from his creditors and the rule of law.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
Zero transparency. Better to be fully honest and true. This way, if you win, you win. The other path earns you the label of fraud and illegitimacy. Americans accept lose but not cheating.
They have no choice but to accept the former if they have nothing to support the latter.
 

Re-Raise

Well-Known Member
Zero transparency. Better to be fully honest and true. This way, if you win, you win. The other path earns you the label of fraud and illegitimacy. Americans accept loss but not cheating.
Absolutely! Just don’t keep complaining that there is fraud just because you don’t like the results.

On either side!
 

JJinVA

Well-Known Member
Absolutely! Just don’t keep complaining that there is fraud just because you don’t like the results.

On either side!
If the dems were smarter about their fraud they might have been able to pull off a decent amount of it. But they got greedy and now might expose all of it. *shrug* They made their fraud too obvious this time around
 

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
Absolutely! Just don’t keep complaining that there is fraud just because you don’t like the results.

On either side!
What would you consider to be good proof of fraud?

And have you ever seen proof that Venezuela, Russia, or any tinpot dictator in Africa cheated in an election?

No?

You accept it based on mass irregularities and logical impossibilities.

Stalinesque turnout is a giveaway.
 

Re-Raise

Well-Known Member
What would you consider to be good proof of fraud?

And have you ever seen proof that Venezuela, Russia, or any tinpot dictator in Africa cheated in an election?

No?

You accept it based on mass irregularities and logical impossibilities.

Stalinesque turnout is a giveaway.
Oh brother ...stop crying!

Trump barely won last time in some of these states and Hillary..was more of a man about it than you clowns!
 

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
It's true. They have sat those contested ballots aside for the pending law suit. It would be impossible to separate ballots after opened and included in the general batch. Since those ballots have been called into question, they have been set aside.
Oh, you mean the small fraction that weren't backdated at a corrupt post office?
 

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
Oh brother ...stop crying!

Trump barely won last time in some of these states and Hillary..was more of a man about it than you clowns!
What would you consider good proof of mass fraud?

There isn't anything.

So you are asking for evidence but there is no form you would accept.

I know nobody else here has a grad degree in math, but are you familiar with Benford's Law? I'm sorry in advance that my good arguments will require you to learn stuff.
 

FedUPSer9816

Full Service
Trump encouraged his supporters to vote in person on election day, the immediate results you saw. Biden encouraged his supporters to vote early, by mail, the results you are seeing now. Those ballots in some places couldn't even be opened, counted, until after the close of election, this the delayed results in counting millions.
 

Re-Raise

Well-Known Member
What would you consider good proof of mass fraud?

There isn't anything.

So you are asking for evidence but there is no form you would accept.

I know nobody else here has a grad degree in math, but are you familiar with Benford's Law? I'm sorry in advance that my good arguments will require you to learn stuff.
You’re hopeless. Man up a little.
 
Top