Election predictions

[vantexan]

Oh brother ...stop crying!

Trump barely won last time in some of these states and Hillary..was more of a man about it than you clowns!

Hillary has been crying she was cheated for four years now. Come to think of it so have all the Democrats. The difference between now and 2016 is the Democrats were taken by surprise in 2016. Never saw it coming. This time they made sure they'd win no matter what.

 

[wilberforce15]

You’re hopeless. Man up a little.

Are you familiar with Benford's Law?

It is a wya of determining with high probabilities whether a given data set is organically or naturally occurring, or if it was manipulated or thought up by a person. It's very good at detecting human influence in a data set. That's because humans act and think differently than nature. If you tell a man to generate a random number, it won't be random. There will always be hallmarks of human intervention in data.

Now you know something that you didn't know before.

And would you like me to show you precinct reporting results that trip every single red flag in benfords law?

 

[DriverNerd]

How many states will need to do recounts? This election isn't going to be over anytime soon.

 

[MAKAVELI]

It's really easy. For example:

PA law absolutely, positively, clearly requires ballots to be received by election day.

Not postmarked by election day.

There isn't any question. It's not hard.

The judges and officials are simply ignoring the law.

They segregated the ones that weren't received on election day and haven't counted them try to keep up.

 

[wilberforce15]

They segregated the ones that weren't received on election day and haven't counted them try to keep up.

False. They told you they segregated them

 

[Box Ox]

More than 4 million more people have voted for Biden. That's why he'll be your next president.

 

[Re-Raise]

Hillary has been crying she was cheated for four years now. Come to think of it so have all the Democrats. The difference between now and 2016 is the Democrats were taken by surprise in 2016. Never saw it coming. This time they made sure they'd win no matter what.

Are you familiar with Benford's Law?

It is a wya of determining with high probabilities whether a given data set is organically or naturally occurring, or if it was manipulated or thought up by a person. It's very good at detecting human influence in a data set. That's because humans act and think differently than nature. If you tell a man to generate a random number, it won't be random. There will always be hallmarks of human intervention in data.

Now you know something that you didn't know before.

And would you like me to show you precinct reporting results that trip every single red flag in benfords law?

You are out there hoss! Every campaign predicts numbers in area based on past results and trends.

If you are somehow calling this some kind of self fulfilling prophecy, I would argue it as just normal prediction models.

Anyway, you are too sad right now for me to deal with you. I’m out.

 

[wilberforce15]

You are out there hoss! Every campaign predicts numbers in area based on past results and trends.

If you are somehow calling this some kind of self fulfilling prophecy, I would argue it as just normal prediction models.

Anyway, you are too sad right now for me to deal with you. I’m out.

This has nothing to do with a predictive model. It has nothing to do with past results or trends. It's about whether a number is concocted by a person. We're very good at detecting that. I'm afraid you're not smart enough to talk to.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

The ballots received after election day, though post marked and mailed beforehand, are segregated and not included in the count. Biden has taken the lead in PA. Checkmate.

Why are you under the impression that those segregated ballots have not been counted in the totals?

 

[Jumpin Jack Flash]

Trumps days are numbered. Biden over takes Trump in Pennsylvania and Georgia.

 

[FedUPSer9816]

Why are you under the impression that those segregated ballots have not been counted in the totals?

Because the officials have set then aside. They won't be counted pending the law suit.

 

[FedUPSer9816]

Good things come out of Philadelphia!

 

[vantexan]

Because the officials have set then aside. They won't be counted pending the law suit.

No, they were counted but then set aside. The current vote count reflects that.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Because the officials have set then aside. They won't be counted pending the law suit.

You didn't answer the question.
Why are you under the impression that the ballots that have been set aside haven't been counted?

 

[Box Ox]

 

[bacha29]

The real question here is, will YOU accept Trumps victory if widespread fraud is confirmed?

Do you realize that to this point Trump's suits over the election has only yielded him the right to place his observers 6 feet feet closer to the vote counters in one Pennsylvania county?

So if he really does have clear cut and actionable evidence to support their claim of voter fraud they have to act NOW before the results are certified.

I'm sure many Americans in the interest of fair play would be receptive to an investigation regarding wide spread voter fraud if the claim was backed with concrete evidence. If it exists put the evidence cards on the table.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Do you realize that to this point Trump's suits over the election has only yielded him the right to place his observers 6 feet feet closer to the vote counters in one Pennsylvania county?

Democrats didn't want Republicans watching the counting.

Democrats have appealed a court decision to allow Republicans to watch the counting.

Why do you think that is?

Fraud or not, that is a great way to fuel conspiracy theories and undermine the integrity of the election.

 

[JJinVA]

Do you realize that to this point Trump's suits over the election has only yielded him the right to place his observers 6 feet feet closer to the vote counters in one Pennsylvania county?

So if he really does have clear cut and actionable evidence to support their claim of voter fraud they have to act NOW before the results are certified.

I'm sure many Americans in the interest of fair play would be receptive to an investigation regarding wide spread voter fraud if the claim was backed with concrete evidence. If it exists put the evidence cards on the table.

Hate to break it to you chief but Im not the one doing the investigation, so I couldnt possibly have anything to "put on the table" for you. Im waiting patiently just like every other American. I dont consider anything taking place right now to be anything more than political theatrics. When the facts come out we'll all have something to work with. Until then, we're just talking sh-- to each other, which is also fun btw

 

[vantexan]

Do you realize that to this point Trump's suits over the election has only yielded him the right to place his observers 6 feet feet closer to the vote counters in one Pennsylvania county?

So if he really does have clear cut and actionable evidence to support their claim of voter fraud they have to act NOW before the results are certified.

I'm sure many Americans in the interest of fair play would be receptive to an investigation regarding wide spread voter fraud if the claim was backed with concrete evidence. If it exists put the evidence cards on the table.

Not 6' closer. Within 6'. They were being kept 30' and further away. Or being forced out of the building altogether with windows covered in Detroit.

 

[bacha29]

Democrats didn't want Republicans watching the counting.

Democrats have appealed a court decision to allow Republicans to watch the counting.

Why do you think that is?

Fraud or not, that is a great way to fuel conspiracy theories and undermine the integrity of the election.

And when you conserclucks latest conspiracy theory is debunked then once again you'll move onto the next.