The good news is that it's an election year and even if a republican wins in November, the sign will still be relevant. All you do is put the new republican President's name in to replace Obama's and it's just as equally true. And you thought we didn't have bipartisanship in gov't!
But we can't "come together". We proved that all last summer on the debt debacle.I am just not cynical like you. You may call it naive or ignorant, but I disagree that things can not change. Though the establishment of Washington politics is extremely entrenched, I think regular folk like us can make a difference. With current technology the way it is, we can make a difference. We need to be speaking out to our representatives and vote for change.
Look at the Arab Spring. When we come together for a common purpose we can effect change. I have seen great Presidents on both sides of the aisle make a difference for all of America.
Obama doesn't have the knack of bringing people together. He's polarizing. He's not got what it takes to be a leader.But we can't "come together". We proved that all last summer on the debt debacle.
The right are in the process of finding that out.And on the right? Who will be the great healer?
Once there is just ONE candidate....."Coming together" will not happen.
The sign is clearly photoshopped. There is no way State Farm would allow one of it's agents to post this above one of their signs.
I am just not cynical like you. You may call it naive or ignorant, but I disagree that things can not change. Though the establishment of Washington politics is extremely entrenched, I think regular folk like us can make a difference. With current technology the way it is, we can make a difference. We need to be speaking out to our representatives and vote for change.
Look at the Arab Spring. When we come together for a common purpose we can effect change. I have seen great Presidents on both sides of the aisle make a difference for all of America.
wkmac - I do agree with "think local act local"
bbsam, the reason we can't come together is because there is no leadership at the top like More has said. The President has to get his hands dirty. He tends to get his minions to do the work. (Reid, Pelosi, Biden etc). He has to take the time to sit down with both sides and bring real compromise to the table. Instead, he has not stopped campaigning. He shows nothing but contempt for the Republicans and continues to play the blame game. As President, he has to be above all the BS in Congress but instead he falls prey to it.
If Clinton could do it with a Republican Congress, it can be done. Movement can be made with a real leader. There are a lot of Republicans who dislike Clinton but again I think he was a reasonable man and a fine President. He led from the middle. He realized that his job as President was to lead all of America. To this day, I listen to him talk and I can't find much fault with what he says. I feel he is a leader. My only beef with him was that he disgraced the office of President with his sexual antics.
I am a Romney supporter. He is the best choice to lead from the middle. I have watched him work miracles for the Olympics and know he will work with both Democrats and Republicans. BO has had his chance to show us what he can do and he has failed miserably.
As you know Reagan asked the question "Are you better off than you were four years ago?
I am much worse off now than I was four years ago. I cannot AFFORD four more years of this administration!! I use the term administration loosely.
That is just plain stupid.Unless you were laid off you are probably better off today!!
Unless you were layed off you are probably better off today!!
People seem to forget about September 11, 2001. All air transportation was suspended, the stock market was vulnerable to a huge crash, New York City the financial capital of the world was crippled. We had to prepare for terrorism on all fronts. GW Bush will go down in history as one of the greatest Presidents. He brought the country together after our country was brought to our knees. He was a war President. He is a moderate. GW is no conservative! If his administration had not put the policies into place that he did, we would likely have had a major recession that would have set the country back years. Of course this is speculation because there is no way to know for sure but Congress (both sides of the aisle) coalesced around around him.
It is the media that makes him look like an ass. He is not. It is the same media who is making the (R) candidates look like idiots now. They are not.
Congress was controlled by Dems since 2006 but the media doe not mention that. BO controlled 2/3 of our government his first 2 years and did nothing but put us deeper in debt, create tons of bureaucracy and spent the whole time working on Universal Health Care that only has 50% approval of the population. The 50% who want a nanny state to take care of all their needs.
He and the media also completely divided us as a nation. Dems and the media and 2 zealots on this website paint Republicans as backward, hillbilly redneck, bible and gun toting racist lunatics. You can bet that "them thar are fightin words" !!! It is the President's job to make sure we are all play in the sandbox ok. It is not that he can't do it, he won't do it. He is too afraid of alienating the elite leftist base. He does not know how to lead.