Global warming

[roadrunner2012]

What does blacklisted mean in the context of this forum mean anyway? And you can respond at any time to the peer reviewed articles that I linked to as I eagerly await your reply. No not really but give it your best shot.

I'm in the queue, and cannot respond until my post is approved by the powers to be.

I have seen no links by you, or the wolf guy, that are to peer reviewed, scientific papers. Nor do I expect to.

 

[roadrunner2012]

Oldngray since he doesn't seem to want to respond what they normally say is that doesn't matter. We are only concerned with trends. Is that about correct roadrunner?

No, we are concerned with anomalies. That is the state we are in today, anomalies.

 

[roadrunner2012]

To them short term trends = global warming if it supports their case but if it doesn't then they say its just short term abnormality or merely weather. They can't let facts upset their inconvenient truth now can they?

Trends that cannot be explained by natural forces. Read the scientific papers.

 

[roadrunner2012]

That's actually untrue also.

To quote a famous right wing hero, 'You lie'.

 

[MAKAVELI]

http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/info/warming/

 

[av8torntn]

To quote a famous right wing hero, 'You lie'.

So is that why you are avoiding your peer reviewed papers I posted that you asked for.

You really feel that the scientific process is a lie?

 

[oldngray]

Trends that cannot be explained by natural forces. Read the scientific papers.

Can't be explained does not mean proof of an assumption. That is not how the scientific method works.

 

[roadrunner2012]

Can't be explained does not mean proof of an assumption. That is not how the scientific method works.

It isn't? How does it work?

 

[roadrunner2012]

So is that why you are avoiding your peer reviewed papers I posted that you asked for.

You really feel that the scientific process is a lie?

Please, I have seen nothing but editorials posted by you, and incomplete quotes. Link to the scientific, peer reviewed papers, or point me to the buried paper you posted.

 

[av8torntn]

Can't be explained does not mean proof of an assumption. That is not how the scientific method works.

It isn't? How does it work?

I already posted a link to the scientific method for you.

 

[roadrunner2012]

I already posted a link to the scientific method for you.

Post it again, I didn't see it. Post it here, now.

 

[av8torntn]

Post it again, I didn't see it. Post it here, now.

Its in the reply I made with the peer reviewed articles you asked me to post that I'm still waiting on your reply to.

 

[roadrunner2012]

Its in the reply I made with the peer reviewed articles you asked me to post that I'm still waiting on your reply to.

I looked through your posts, didn't see it. Why don't you just link to it and cut the excuses?

 

[av8torntn]

I looked through your posts, didn't see it. Why don't you just link to it and cut the excuses?

Why don't you just read it and stop being lazy?

 

[roadrunner2012]

Post a link instead of being obtuse. I'm in the queue and there is a 20 minute lapse before my posts show up. I've gone through a page of your posts and have seen no links to peer reviewed, scientific, articles.

 

[tonyexpress]

Only 20 minutes in the queue. I feel special.

You should, you've earned it. While you've posted a lot tonight many of your post have been approved right away, not sure why.

 

[av8torntn]

Post a link instead of being obtuse. I'm in the queue and there is a 20 minute lapse before my posts show up. I've gone through a page of your posts and have seen no links to peer reviewed, scientific, articles.

One of the question I posed was what would your response be after one poster resorted to name calling and one pitched a fit. Well the answer turned out to be that you would just ignore it. Well can't say I'm all that surprised.

 

[roadrunner2012]

You should, you've earned it. While you've posted a lot tonight many of your post have been approved right away, not sure why.

Thanks, Tony.

Some, but not all. Science is hard. You're a denier, right? Post up some science and let's discuss.

 

[wkmac]

You should, you've earned it. While you've posted a lot tonight many of your post have been approved right away, not sure why.

Some like it hot.

 

[roadrunner2012]

One of the question I posed was what would your response be after one poster resorted to name calling and one pitched a fit. Well the answer turned out to be that you would just ignore it. Well can't say I'm all that surprised.

That's a peer reviewed paper?