Global warming
- Thread starter mthbstr8
- Start date
MrFedEx
Engorged Member
I think you need a trip to the Creation Museum. You can ride a T-Rex...just like your ancestors did. Can anyone really be so ignorant?
av8torntn
Well-Known Member
Don't get mad it's Not my fault that your propaganda doesn't hold up to science. It's so easy to tell you're a loser when you start the name calling.
Perceptions can be misleading, just like Watts and Goddard:
http://mashable.com/2014/03/14/winter-cold-2014-perspective/
http://mashable.com/2014/03/14/winter-cold-2014-perspective/
av8torntn
Well-Known Member
But those pesky facts keep getting in your way.
Coldest Year On Record So Far In The US | Real Science
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/05/08/coldest-year-on-record-so-far-in-the-us/
Since you obviously missed it the first three times.
wkmac
Well-Known Member
MrFedEx
Engorged Member
I think someone who ignores massive scientific evidence is both a loser and ignorant. There seem to be a lot of you people out there bankrupting our government through your refusal to accept the truth. The world is only 6,000 years old, rocks and dinosaur bones were planted by Satan to make us believe the world is older than it is, and the world is getting colder every day.
av8torntn
Well-Known Member
Sure but if you really felt that way you wouldn't continue to ignore scientific evidence. Instead the opposite is likely true.
Catatonic
Nine Lives
I saw today that Brazil is the most improved in reducing "Climate Change" gases and Indonesia is the worse producer.
Over half of green-house gases are produced by slash-and-burn technique used to clear land around the world.
Burning peat produces 10 times the amount of green-house gases than burning a tree.
Landfills and cows produce as much methane (much worse than carbon dioxide as a green-house gases) as all other sources together.
The news reporters and environmentalists kept saying humans caused the climate change and the scientists kept correcting them that humans contributed to climate change.
BTW, this post is not trying to make a point.
Just some observations from watching the show.
Over half of green-house gases are produced by slash-and-burn technique used to clear land around the world.
Burning peat produces 10 times the amount of green-house gases than burning a tree.
Landfills and cows produce as much methane (much worse than carbon dioxide as a green-house gases) as all other sources together.
The news reporters and environmentalists kept saying humans caused the climate change and the scientists kept correcting them that humans contributed to climate change.
BTW, this post is not trying to make a point.
Just some observations from watching the show.
Last edited:
cachsux
Wah
Anyone who believes the world is only 6000 years old has never checked the expiration date on a sandwich bought out of a vending machine.
Trying hard to figure out what your point is. That scientists say humans have contributed to, but are not the only cause of climate change? No argument there.
That methane is bad, too? Yes, it's different than CO2, disperses faster, but traps pollutants more effectively than CO2 in the atmosphere, and 60% of all methane is produced by human activity, so what's your point?
This page may help clarify the 'big picture':
http://epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/gases.html
oldngray
nowhere special
John Cook is an Australian alarmist who a year ago produced a paper purporting to show that 97 per cent of studies supported the "consensus" on man-made global warming. It was eagerly seized on by the left-wing activists who run President Obama's Twitter account, who gleefully tweeted under the name @barackobama "Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made and dangerous" - with a link to the paper.
But the paper, in fact, showed nothing of the kind. Recently a researcher named Brandon Shollenberger gained access to some of the data used in Cook's paper and found the statistical methodology to be fatally flawed.
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/05/16/Climate-McCarthyism-the-scandal-grows
But the paper, in fact, showed nothing of the kind. Recently a researcher named Brandon Shollenberger gained access to some of the data used in Cook's paper and found the statistical methodology to be fatally flawed.
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/05/16/Climate-McCarthyism-the-scandal-grows
oldngray
nowhere special
A group of 15 scientists and meteorologists have put forward a scathing rebuttal to the Obama administration’s recent climate report which said the U.S. is already being harmed by global warming.
http://dailycaller.com/2014/05/16/s...te-house-global-warming-report/#ixzz320BOxnd8
http://dailycaller.com/2014/05/16/s...te-house-global-warming-report/#ixzz320BOxnd8
MrFedEx
Engorged Member
I love Bill Nye.
MrFedEx
Engorged Member
Here's my explanation. Republicans are real, man-made, and dangerous.
oldngray, do you know who those scientists are?
A quick search for the names at the bottom of that report was very revealing. We have everything from Evangelicals to people who supported tobacco companies, saying smoking wasn't dangerous, to a guy who thinks one of Mars moons is an artificial satellite, members of the Heartland Institute, and part of the Cato Institute's 100 deniers. People on the payroll of Exxon, people who lied about their credentials and people who actually flunked out of meteorology school, yet list it on their resume.
Pick any name of the list, and I'll be happy to tell you more about them. Choose wisely, grasshopper.
oldngray
nowhere special
Attack the messenger instead of trying to refute the message again. I would stack any one of them above your experts. Like Bill Nye? Really.
