For being right?!give yourself a troll label.
For being right?!give yourself a troll label.
For being right?!
Of course I do. The Congress has been dysfunctional for years. Every now and then they try like all the times they try to repeal the ACA since the Supreme Court ruled it constitutional. The Court simply says yes or no ad to constitutionality. They didn't write the laws.you have to be trolling no way you believe that.
without foundation. The Court simply says yes or no .
Really? You've read the decisions? Yeah. I thought not.without foundation
Really? You've read the decisions? Yeah. I thought not.
No. I would like you to explain court decisions and the deficiencies in the majority opinions that have you claim their rulings are "without foundation".pouting?
No. I would like you to explain court decisions and the deficiencies in the majority opinions that have you claim their rulings are "without foundation".
No. I'm waiting for you to back up your assertion. Actually I'm not because I know you cant.so you are pouting?
so you are pouting? your next post will be an admomishment If I don't immediately provide a well written legal thesis.
No. I'm waiting for you to back up your assertion. Actually I'm not because I know you cant.
Hardly. You simply can't do it because you've been told what to think in sound bites. I understand.touchdown. You're too predictable.
Hardly. blah, blah, blah,...liberal, blah, Obama, blah, blah, blah,...EIB Network...blah, blah..."
You would think so.possibly the most intelligent thing you have said yet.
It's not in any Supreme Court decisions.What's EIB Network...blah, ?
Been watching the Trailers for Transylvania 2 ?
" I never say blah ,blah ,blah ."
You have made it perfectly clear that you beleive it's perfectly OK for SCOTUS to legislate from the bench whenever their agendas arent attainable from legislation or The Constitution.Hardly. You simply can't do it because you've been told what to think in sound bites. I understand.
"Activist court...blah, blah, blah,...2nd Amendment, blah, blah, blah,...liberal, blah, Obama, blah, blah, blah,...EIB Network...blah, blah..."
All you have to do is pick a.decision you disagree with, explain the Court's reasoning and explain why the Court is wrong. Instead, all you do is complain about "legislating from the bench" and "activist judges". I understand that's easier but it's intellectually lazy and adds to the collective political stupidity that runs rampant in this country.You have made it perfectly clear that you beleive it's perfectly OK for SCOTUS to legislate from the bench whenever their agendas arent attainable from legislation or The Constitution.
What you don't seem to get is that under no circumstances is the SCOTUS allowed to legislate from the bench.All you have to do is pick a.decision you disagree with, explain the Court's reasoning and explain why the Court is wrong. Instead, all you do is complain about "legislating from the bench" and "activist judges". I understand that's easier but it's intellectually lazy and adds to the collective political stupidity that runs rampant in this country.
You seem to believe that these decisions are simply made up, fictions imposed upon the populace with no basis in jurisprudence or constitutional soundness. I'm sure you wish that to be true but it's not.
What you don't seem to get is that under no circumstances is the SCOTUS allowed to legislate from the bench.
They are to go by the letter, or the intent of the law only.
Not a difficult concept for most people to grasp.