I have read all the posts, and looked over all the responses.
There is one question that comes to mind.
"Why have you not mentioned anything about an INDIRECT attempt anywhere as required by standard 3/40 methods?"
Georgiabrown, you also stated that the company said you "were sheeting the pkg someplace else rather than in front of the actual address".
If not for GPS, how would they know this? Telematics is problematic and not 100% accurate as we have shown here in so. cal, but when it comes to placing you somewhere, they are pretty close.
So, if they have you on GPS in a position other than the actual address, then you would be guilty of defrauding the company out of a legitimate delivery attempt. Is it possible that you merely "believed" no one would be there on that day, and make a decision to record the package as closed at a different location to avoid going there?
This does happen to alot of drivers who are not expecting a person to be at the place on a day that no one would otherwise be there...then they are there waiting and the driver does not show up.
If so, maybe you and the agent could just state the facts and take the time off as a suspension and get back to work? Why go thru all this hassle if you truly just made a mistake?
If the companies position is that you "smoked" the pkg and did not make a legitimate delivery attempt, then in panel, the company would have to PROVE you were not there. The fact that there may not be a record of the delivery is NOT proof that you did not attempt the pkg.
Remember, you are INNOCENT until proven guilty, not the other way around. The onis on the company to prove you were not there and did not make an attempt.
Regardless of the "recorded" error (CLO H) this will prove to be irrelevant to the panel. The panel is quite aware of sheeting err's and this would not constitute dishonesty.
What
WILL prove dishonesty is if the company can prove you were somewhere else when you recorded the pkg. Just because you have not gone online with telematics yet does not disqualify the company from using it against you. The new contract sealed our fates there.
If they are in testing mode, then they have access to the data and it DOES NOT have to be
TURNED On to be used. This is a myth.
I have been trained by the company on the telematics system even though I am the senior steward just so that I can understand the operation of the software.
As I said before, the system is chock-ful of glitches but the majority of info is pretty close to accurate.
My main focus on your case is this:
1) why no indirect attempt as required.
2) Has any package been sheeted as CLO H for that address in the past.
3) Is there an establish business pattern of Closed on that day going back....how long?
4) What do the printed sheets show as a record of delivery/attempt..time is critical.
5) What is the recorded transit pattern of the tracking number involved.
6) Can the company place you at a different location when the stop was completed.
These are my questions for you..
Good luck,